2012
DOI: 10.1103/physrevlett.108.021802
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Upper Bounds on Superpartner Masses from Upper Bounds on the Higgs Boson Mass

Abstract: The LHC is putting bounds on the Higgs boson mass. In this Letter we use those bounds to constrain the minimal supersymmetric standard model (MSSM) parameter space using the fact that, in supersymmetry, the Higgs mass is a function of the masses of sparticles, and therefore an upper bound on the Higgs mass translates into an upper bound for the masses for superpartners. We show that, although current bounds do not constrain the MSSM parameter space from above, once the Higgs mass bound improves big regions of … Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
60
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(60 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
60
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As is well known, the value of tan β must be rather large, so that the tree-level Higgs mass, (m 2 h ) tree−level = M 2 Z cos 2 2β, is as large as possible, M 2 Z ; otherwise, the radiative corrections needed to reconcile the Higgs mass with its experimental value, would imply gigantic stop masses [85,86] (see subsection 2.3 above) and thus an extremely fine-tuned scenario. Notice here that the focus-point regime is not useful to cure such fine-tuning since it only works if tan β is rather large and stop masses are not huge.…”
Section: Fine-tunings Left Asidementioning
confidence: 99%
“…As is well known, the value of tan β must be rather large, so that the tree-level Higgs mass, (m 2 h ) tree−level = M 2 Z cos 2 2β, is as large as possible, M 2 Z ; otherwise, the radiative corrections needed to reconcile the Higgs mass with its experimental value, would imply gigantic stop masses [85,86] (see subsection 2.3 above) and thus an extremely fine-tuned scenario. Notice here that the focus-point regime is not useful to cure such fine-tuning since it only works if tan β is rather large and stop masses are not huge.…”
Section: Fine-tunings Left Asidementioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is not difficult to imagine theories able to drive λ(M Pl ) to zero: high-scale supersymmetry with tan β = 1 [123][124][125][126][127][128]; partial N = 2 supersymmetry insuring D-flatness [129,130]; an approximate Goldstone or shift symmetry [131,132]; an infrared fixed-point of some transplanckian physics [121]; a powerlaw running in a quasi-conformal theory. Present data suggest that an exact zero of λ is reached at scales of about 10 10 -10 12 GeV, see eq.…”
Section: Matching Conditionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A dedicated analysis of the resulting prediction for the Higgs mass as function ofm and of tan β was performed in [57] (see also [58]). We here update the results, including the new correction which increases the predicted Higgs mass by an amount that changes with M h .…”
Section: Supersymmetrymentioning
confidence: 99%