2022
DOI: 10.1103/physreve.106.024611
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Upper bound of fragility from spatial fluctuations of shear modulus and boson peak in glasses

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 71 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These values are close to those of most polymers, some small organic molecules with abundant aromatic groups, and inorganic glass formers with strong ionic interactions 41,42 . Yet, these values markedly deviate from those of traditional silicate glass-formers, water, and small organic molecules with strong hydrogen bonding interactions 41,[43][44][45] . This disparity can be ascribed to the synergy of hydrogen bonds, aromatic interactions, and hydrophobic effects 3,46 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 75%
“…These values are close to those of most polymers, some small organic molecules with abundant aromatic groups, and inorganic glass formers with strong ionic interactions 41,42 . Yet, these values markedly deviate from those of traditional silicate glass-formers, water, and small organic molecules with strong hydrogen bonding interactions 41,[43][44][45] . This disparity can be ascribed to the synergy of hydrogen bonds, aromatic interactions, and hydrophobic effects 3,46 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 75%
“…5 . It is noted that this upper bound fragility value of 70 is predicted only for silicate glasses with a ring structure; glasses with other structural types, such as molecular materials and polymers, may have much higher fragility values, with an upper limit predicted to be 180 34 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%