2002
DOI: 10.1016/s0890-6955(02)00007-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Upper bound analysis of oblique cutting with nose radius tools

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Seethaler and Yellowley [14] have proposed a so called "Upper-bound model" based on the minimisation of the cutting power (sum of shear and friction energies) to predict chip flow angle. This approach was extended later by AdibiSedeh et al [15] and recently improved by Zou et al [16]. Fang [17] has developed a similar approach to determine the chip flow angle and also the chip flow speed.…”
Section: Experimental Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Seethaler and Yellowley [14] have proposed a so called "Upper-bound model" based on the minimisation of the cutting power (sum of shear and friction energies) to predict chip flow angle. This approach was extended later by AdibiSedeh et al [15] and recently improved by Zou et al [16]. Fang [17] has developed a similar approach to determine the chip flow angle and also the chip flow speed.…”
Section: Experimental Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on the studies [27] of Colwell, Stabler, Armarego, etc., Hu et al [28] presented a geometric model called equivalent cutting edge model. Considering the influence of major cutting edge and minor cutting edge, the chip flow direction is along the direction shown in the Fig.…”
Section: Equivalent Cutting Edge Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fang [27] improved a model for oblique cutting to control chip flow direction and chip flow speed. Adibi-Sedeh et al [28] performed an analysis to study the effects of using flat-faced nose radius tools for calculating the chip flow angle. Validation of the model was presented in the research.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%