2008
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-246x.2008.03925.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Upper and lower stiffness bounds for porous anisotropic rocks

Abstract: S U M M A R YWe derive double inequalities providing the bounds for components of the effective stiffness tensor of a two-phase, porous-cracked medium with aligned ellipsoidal inclusions. The bounds are derived on the basis of the Hashin-Shtrikman variational principle, and the conditions for positive semi-definiteness of quadratic forms. Inequalities are presented for isotropic, cubic, hexagonal and orthorhombic overall symmetries. The results obtained for orthorhombic symmetry are valid for the general deter… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In case of anisotropic materials, the applicability is guaranteed only for main diagonal elements. 27 The comparison of the given numerical examples with the analytical solutions of Voigt and Reuss bounds shows the applicability and trustworthiness of our approach.…”
Section: Simulationmentioning
confidence: 70%
“…In case of anisotropic materials, the applicability is guaranteed only for main diagonal elements. 27 The comparison of the given numerical examples with the analytical solutions of Voigt and Reuss bounds shows the applicability and trustworthiness of our approach.…”
Section: Simulationmentioning
confidence: 70%
“…Since the moduli and anisotropy parameters calculated using Voigt and Reuss schemes could be considerably different from each other (Dutta, 2018), the relative proportion within the two averaging schemes is also considered as a free parameter in this study. The relative proportion lies between 0 and 1 (0 coincide with the Reuss scheme while 1 gives the Voigt scheme) although the Voigt and Reuss schemes are not strict bounds for anisotropic domains (e.g., Bayuk et al., 2008). Note that the choice of Voigt versus Reuss averaging scheme would depend on configuration of clay platelets, which is very difficult to assess.…”
Section: Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%