Abstract:We describe and apply a linear inverse model which calculates spatial and temporal patterns of uplift rate by minimizing the misfit between inventories of observed and predicted longitudinal river profiles. Our approach builds upon a more general, nonlinear, optimization model, which suggests that shapes of river profiles are dominantly controlled by upstream advection of kinematic waves of incision produced by spatial and temporal changes in regional uplift rate. Here we use the method of characteristics to s… Show more
“…However, recent numerical studies, such as Rudge et al (2015), have expanded this model to cover continent-scale landscapes. It is clearly plausible to suppose that erosion is primarily due to flowing water, so the assumption of geologically instantaneous transport may well be valid for mass that is transported as suspended load within the water column.…”
Section: Erosion Within a Single Dimension Systemmentioning
confidence: 48%
“…Using a version of Eq. (11) to invert river profiles for uplift histories, it is argued by some authors that n is close to unity (Rudge et al, 2015). However, certain river profiles may arguably be indicative of n > 1 (Lague, 2014).…”
Section: Erosion Within a Single Dimension Systemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, there is reasonable debate as to the value of the slope exponent n in the stream power model (e.g. Lague, 2014;Croissant and Braun, 2014;Rudge et al, 2015) and likewise within the transport model it is plausible that the slope exponent γ > 1. The response time for the stream power model for various values of n has been explored within Baldwin et al (2003).…”
Section: Non-linear Response Timescalesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Pritchard et al, 2009). Studies of continent-scale inversion have found that the best fit value of k for the stream power model increases by 2 orders of magnitude to fit river profiles in Africa relative to Australia (Rudge et al, 2015). Such a large change in k would result in a highly significant difference in response time from continent to continent, which in itself would imply that tectonic and climatic signals are preserved in landscapes and sediment archives over vastly different time periods (see Demoulin et al, 2017).…”
Section: Response Times As a Function Of Model Choicementioning
Abstract. Laboratory-scale experiments of erosion have demonstrated that landscapes have a natural (or intrinsic) response time to a change in precipitation rate. In the last few decades there has been growth in the development of numerical models that attempt to capture landscape evolution over long timescales. However, there is still an uncertainty regarding the validity of the basic assumptions of mass transport that are made in deriving these models. In this contribution we therefore return to a principal assumption of sediment transport within the mass balance for surface processes; we explore the sensitivity of the classic end-member landscape evolution models and the sediment fluxes they produce to a change in precipitation rates. One end-member model takes the mathematical form of a kinetic wave equation and is known as the stream power model, in which sediment is assumed to be transported immediately out of the model domain. The second end-member model is the transport model and it takes the form of a diffusion equation, assuming that the sediment flux is a function of the water flux and slope. We find that both of these end-member models have a response time that has a proportionality to the precipitation rate that follows a negative power law. However, for the stream power model the exponent on the water flux term must be less than one, and for the transport model the exponent must be greater than one, in order to match the observed concavity of natural systems. This difference in exponent means that the transport model generally responds more rapidly to an increase in precipitation rates, on the order of 10 5 years for post-perturbation sediment fluxes to return to within 50 % of their initial values, for theoretical landscapes with a scale of 100 × 100 km. Additionally from the same starting conditions, the amplitude of the sediment flux perturbation in the transport model is greater, with much larger sensitivity to catchment size. An important finding is that both models respond more quickly to a wetting event than a drying event, and we argue that this asymmetry in response time has significant implications for depositional stratigraphies. Finally, we evaluate the extent to which these constraints on response times and sediment fluxes from simple models help us understand the geological record of landscape response to rapid environmental changes in the past, such as the Paleocene-Eocene thermal maximum (PETM). In the Spanish Pyrenees, for instance, a relatively rapid (10 to 50 kyr) duration of the deposition of gravel is observed for a climatic shift that is thought to be towards increased precipitation rates. We suggest that the rapid response observed is more easily explained through a diffusive transport model because (1) the model has a faster response time, which is consistent with the documented stratigraphic data, (2) there is a high-amplitude spike in sediment flux, and (3) the assumption of instantaneous transport is difficult to justify for the transport of large grain sizes as an alluvi...
“…However, recent numerical studies, such as Rudge et al (2015), have expanded this model to cover continent-scale landscapes. It is clearly plausible to suppose that erosion is primarily due to flowing water, so the assumption of geologically instantaneous transport may well be valid for mass that is transported as suspended load within the water column.…”
Section: Erosion Within a Single Dimension Systemmentioning
confidence: 48%
“…Using a version of Eq. (11) to invert river profiles for uplift histories, it is argued by some authors that n is close to unity (Rudge et al, 2015). However, certain river profiles may arguably be indicative of n > 1 (Lague, 2014).…”
Section: Erosion Within a Single Dimension Systemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, there is reasonable debate as to the value of the slope exponent n in the stream power model (e.g. Lague, 2014;Croissant and Braun, 2014;Rudge et al, 2015) and likewise within the transport model it is plausible that the slope exponent γ > 1. The response time for the stream power model for various values of n has been explored within Baldwin et al (2003).…”
Section: Non-linear Response Timescalesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Pritchard et al, 2009). Studies of continent-scale inversion have found that the best fit value of k for the stream power model increases by 2 orders of magnitude to fit river profiles in Africa relative to Australia (Rudge et al, 2015). Such a large change in k would result in a highly significant difference in response time from continent to continent, which in itself would imply that tectonic and climatic signals are preserved in landscapes and sediment archives over vastly different time periods (see Demoulin et al, 2017).…”
Section: Response Times As a Function Of Model Choicementioning
Abstract. Laboratory-scale experiments of erosion have demonstrated that landscapes have a natural (or intrinsic) response time to a change in precipitation rate. In the last few decades there has been growth in the development of numerical models that attempt to capture landscape evolution over long timescales. However, there is still an uncertainty regarding the validity of the basic assumptions of mass transport that are made in deriving these models. In this contribution we therefore return to a principal assumption of sediment transport within the mass balance for surface processes; we explore the sensitivity of the classic end-member landscape evolution models and the sediment fluxes they produce to a change in precipitation rates. One end-member model takes the mathematical form of a kinetic wave equation and is known as the stream power model, in which sediment is assumed to be transported immediately out of the model domain. The second end-member model is the transport model and it takes the form of a diffusion equation, assuming that the sediment flux is a function of the water flux and slope. We find that both of these end-member models have a response time that has a proportionality to the precipitation rate that follows a negative power law. However, for the stream power model the exponent on the water flux term must be less than one, and for the transport model the exponent must be greater than one, in order to match the observed concavity of natural systems. This difference in exponent means that the transport model generally responds more rapidly to an increase in precipitation rates, on the order of 10 5 years for post-perturbation sediment fluxes to return to within 50 % of their initial values, for theoretical landscapes with a scale of 100 × 100 km. Additionally from the same starting conditions, the amplitude of the sediment flux perturbation in the transport model is greater, with much larger sensitivity to catchment size. An important finding is that both models respond more quickly to a wetting event than a drying event, and we argue that this asymmetry in response time has significant implications for depositional stratigraphies. Finally, we evaluate the extent to which these constraints on response times and sediment fluxes from simple models help us understand the geological record of landscape response to rapid environmental changes in the past, such as the Paleocene-Eocene thermal maximum (PETM). In the Spanish Pyrenees, for instance, a relatively rapid (10 to 50 kyr) duration of the deposition of gravel is observed for a climatic shift that is thought to be towards increased precipitation rates. We suggest that the rapid response observed is more easily explained through a diffusive transport model because (1) the model has a faster response time, which is consistent with the documented stratigraphic data, (2) there is a high-amplitude spike in sediment flux, and (3) the assumption of instantaneous transport is difficult to justify for the transport of large grain sizes as an alluvi...
“…Simulating nuclide concentrations in settings where denudation rates vary in space and time is possible (Mudd, 2016), but computationally intensive and one must have some confidence that one can accurately reconstruct the temporal evolution of denudation rates. Although recent progress has been made in deriving time series of denudation rates from current topography (e.g., Whittaker et al, 2008;Pritchard et al, 2009;Hurst et al, 2013;Goren et al, 2014;Fox et al, 2014;Croissant and Braun, 2014;Rudge et al, 2015), these methods still suffer from the fact that we lack devices for time travel and struggle to test such reconstructions.…”
Section: Uncertainties Introduced By Spatial and Temporal Variabilitymentioning
Abstract. We report a new program for calculating catchment-averaged denudation rates from cosmogenic nuclide concentrations. The method (Catchment-Averaged denudatIon Rates from cosmogenic Nuclides: CAIRN) bundles previously reported production scaling and topographic shielding algorithms. In addition, it calculates production and shielding on a pixel-by-pixel basis. We explore the effect of sampling frequency across both azimuth ( θ) and altitude ( φ) angles for topographic shielding and show that in high relief terrain a relatively high sampling frequency is required, with a good balance achieved between accuracy and computational expense at θ = 8 • and φ = 5 • . CAIRN includes both internal and external uncertainty analysis, and is packaged in freely available software in order to facilitate easily reproducible denudation rate estimates. CAIRN calculates denudation rates but also automates catchment averaging of shielding and production, and thus can be used to provide reproducible input parameters for the CRONUS family of online calculators.
Analysis of hillslope gradient, landscape relief, and channel steepness in the Daxia River basin provides evidence of a transient geomorphic response to base‐level fall on the northeastern Tibetan Plateau. Low‐gradient channels and gentle hillslopes of the upper watershed are separated from a steeper, high‐relief landscape by a series of convex knickzones along channel longitudinal profiles. Downstream projection of the “relict” portions of the profiles implies ~800–850 m of incision, consistent with geologic and geomorphic records of post ~1.7 Ma incision in the lower watershed. We combine optically stimulated luminescence dating of fluvial terrace deposits to constrain incision rates downstream of knickpoints with catchment‐averaged 10Be concentrations in modern sediment to estimate erosion rates in tributary basins both above and below knickpoints. Both sources of data imply landscape lowering rates of ~300 m Ma−1 below the knickpoint and ~50–100 m Ma−1 above. Field measurements of channel width (n = 48) and calculations of bankfull discharge (n = 9) allow determination of scaling relations among channel hydraulic geometry, discharge, and contributing area that we employ to estimate the patterns of basal shear stress, unit stream power, and bed load transport rate throughout the channel network. Our results imply a clear downstream increase of incision potential; this result would appear to be consistent with a detachment‐limited response to imposed base‐level fall, in which steepening of channels drives an increase in erosion rates. In contrast, however, we do not observe apparent narrowing of channels across the transition from slowly eroding to rapidly eroding portions of the watershed. Rather, the present‐day channel morphology as well as its scaling of hydraulic geometry imply that the river is primarily adjusted to transport its sediment load and suggest that channel morphology may not always reflect the presence of knickpoints and differences in landscape relief.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.