2013
DOI: 10.1080/1064119x.2012.690827
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Uplift Capacity of Suction Caisson in Clay Using Artificial Intelligence Techniques

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
10
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
1
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The models were executed on Intel Core i5 @3.2GHz processor with 4 GB RAM. The computational e ciencies of the other methods were not available in the literature for comparison [37,44].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The models were executed on Intel Core i5 @3.2GHz processor with 4 GB RAM. The computational e ciencies of the other methods were not available in the literature for comparison [37,44].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The database consists of 62 experimental test results from 12 independent studies. Out of the 62 data, 51 data are selected for training, and the remaining 11 are used for testing the GP, ANN, SVM, RVM, and FEM models as per Muduli et al [37] and ELM model as per Muduli et al [44]. For FN prediction model, Kenstone algorithm, based on Kennard and Stone [59], has been used to select training and testing data.…”
Section: Experimental Database and Data Preprocessingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Though, SVM has better generalization (Samui 2008) compared to ANN, error parameter 'C' and 'e' are to be found out by trial and error. Using the above database, Muduli et al (2013) observed that prediction model using genetic programming (GP) is more efficient compared to ANN and SVM model. It may be mentioned here that unlike ANN, GP is a 'grey box' model (Giustolisi et al 2007), but the model parameters are found out by nontraditional optimization method, genetic algorithm and it is very difficult to explain the development of model.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%