2012
DOI: 10.1140/epjc/s10052-011-1848-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Upgraded breaking of the HLS model: a full solution to the τ−e + e − and ϕ decay issues and its consequences on g−2 VMD estimates

Abstract: The muon anomalous magnetic moment a μ and the hadronic vacuum polarization are examined using data analyzed within the framework of a suitably broken HLS model. The analysis relies on all available scan data samples and leaves provisionally aside the existing ISR data. Our HLS model based global fit approach allows for a better check of consistency between data sets and we investigate how results depend on different strategies which may be followed. Relying on global fit qualities, we find several acceptable … Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

21
295
3

Year Published

2013
2013
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 75 publications
(319 citation statements)
references
References 110 publications
21
295
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Using a symmetry breaking mechanism based on the simple BKY idea [16] and a vector meson mixing scheme, the model has been developed stepwise [17][18][19][20] and its most recent form [13] has been shown to provide a successful simultaneous description of the e + e − annihilation into the π + π − , π 0 γ , ηγ , π + π − π 0 , K + K − , K 0 K 0 final states as well as the τ ± → ν τ π ± π 0 decay spectrum. Some more decays of the form 2 V → P γ or P → γ γ are considered.…”
Section: N} To the Annihilation Cross Sections σ (E + E − → H I )mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Using a symmetry breaking mechanism based on the simple BKY idea [16] and a vector meson mixing scheme, the model has been developed stepwise [17][18][19][20] and its most recent form [13] has been shown to provide a successful simultaneous description of the e + e − annihilation into the π + π − , π 0 γ , ηγ , π + π − π 0 , K + K − , K 0 K 0 final states as well as the τ ± → ν τ π ± π 0 decay spectrum. Some more decays of the form 2 V → P γ or P → γ γ are considered.…”
Section: N} To the Annihilation Cross Sections σ (E + E − → H I )mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Up to now, the broken HLS model (BHLS) [13]basically an empty shell-has been fed with all existing data sets 4 for what concerns the annihilation channels π 0 γ , ηγ , π + π − π 0 , K + K − , K 0 K 0 , with the spectra from ALEPH [21], CLEO [22] and BELLE [23] for the τ dipion decay 5 and with the V P γ /P γ γ partial width information extracted from the Review of Particle Properties (RPP) [24]. This already represents more than 40 data sets collected by different groups with different detectors; one may thus consider that the systematics affecting these data sets wash out to a large extent within a global fit framework.…”
Section: N} To the Annihilation Cross Sections σ (E + E − → H I )mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has been known that there is a discrepancy from the SM prediction by 3.2σ [92] to 4.1σ [93]: In our model, the dominant contribution to the muon g −2 is obtained through the one loop diagram where the muon and the extra neutral gauge boson Z ′ of the U(1) µ−τ symmetry are running in the loop. The resulting form is given by…”
Section: Muon Anomalous Magnetic Moment and Lepton Flavour Violationmentioning
confidence: 75%
“…Several groups, however, have reported an anomaly of the muon anomalous magnetic moment a µ = (g − 2)/2 (muon g-2), which has been precisely measured experimentally [3] and compared with state-of-the-art theoretical predictions (for example, see [4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11] and references therein). The estimated discrepancies between the SM predictions and the measured value are consistently more than 3σ, as listed in table 1.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Following this line, in [6] 31.6 ± 7.9 (4.0σ) [7] 11659208.9 ± 6. 3 33.5 ± 8.2 (4.1σ) [8] 28.3 ± 8.7 (3.3σ) [9] 29.0 ± 9.0 (3.2σ) [10] 28.7 ± 8.0 (3.6σ) [11] Table 1. Measured muon g-2 (a Exp µ ) and the estimated differences (δa µ ) from the recent SM predictions in several references.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%