2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.wace.2018.03.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Upgrade of the HadGEM3-A based attribution system to high resolution and a new validation framework for probabilistic event attribution

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
84
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

5
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 84 publications
(86 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
2
84
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Following Chen et al (2018), the Met Office Hadley Centre attribution model, HadGEM3-GA6 (Christidis et al 2012, Ciavarella et al 2018 ran at a resolution of N216 (about 60-km resolution in mid-latitudes) was used in this study. The model simulates the atmosphere only and includes the latest dynamical core (Wood and Stainforth 2010) and JULES land surface model (Best et al 2011).…”
Section: Hadgem3-ga6-n216mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Following Chen et al (2018), the Met Office Hadley Centre attribution model, HadGEM3-GA6 (Christidis et al 2012, Ciavarella et al 2018 ran at a resolution of N216 (about 60-km resolution in mid-latitudes) was used in this study. The model simulates the atmosphere only and includes the latest dynamical core (Wood and Stainforth 2010) and JULES land surface model (Best et al 2011).…”
Section: Hadgem3-ga6-n216mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This scheme was also present in the 2017 runs, in addition to differences in initial conditions caused by continuing from the Historical ensemble. For more details, see Ciavarella et al (2018).…”
Section: Hadgem3-ga6-n216mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More in‐depth assessments may also delve into the representation of potentially important processes associated with the atmospheric circulation, land–atmosphere, or troposphere–stratosphere interactions (Vautard et al , ). Tailor‐made evaluation methodologies for analyses with atmosphere‐only models have also been proposed (Ciavarella et al , ). Although there are no observational estimates of the HRW and HRD over large spatial scales, there is a close correspondence between them and two T max‐based ETCCDI temperature extreme indices, available from the HadEX2 global gridded data set (Donat et al , ; Sillmann et al , ).…”
Section: Cmip5 Index Trendsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Over the last decade, the Hadley Centre has developed and utilized a state‐of‐the‐art extreme event attribution system with the view of integrating it into its developing climate services. The system has been built on the atmospheric model HadGEM3‐A (Christidis et al , ) and been subjected to meticulous evaluation assessments that have used a combination of standard as well as novel evaluation techniques (Ciavarella et al , ; Vautard et al , ). During the course of the EUropean CLimate and weather Events: Interpretation and Attribution (EUCLEIA) project (https://eucleia.eu/), the operationalization of the Hadley Centre's attribution system was prototyped, modelled after the structurally similar seasonal forecasting system that has been operational in the UK Met Office for several years.…”
Section: The Hadley Centre Attribution Systemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For HadGEM3-A, we also use analogous Historical2017 and Natural2017 simulations to examine the role of SST and sea-ice variability. To estimate biases of the extreme indices from HadGEM3-A and W@H, respectively, we use the historical 15-and 170-member ensembles described in Ciavarella et al (2018) and Sparrow et al (2018) that include both anthropogenic and natural forcings and span 1/1/1960-30/12/2013 and 1/1/1986-30/12/2017, respectively.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%