2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.crad.2014.12.019
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Upgrade of ductal carcinoma in situ on core biopsies to invasive disease at final surgery: a retrospective review across the Scottish Breast Screening Programme

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
12
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
1
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The pathology features including nuclear grade and presence of comedo type necrosis were also not associated with upstaging, despite a prior meta-analysis by Brennan et al [5] which demonstrated an association with invasive cancer; however, this may be due in part to the smaller sample size included in our study. Previous investigators have looked at the predictive power of individual histologic or pathologic features [5, 6, 9, 25, 2729], but only Park et al [9] constructed a nomogram to predict the occult invasiveness of DCIS patients, and obtained an AUC-ROC of 0.71 on their validation set. Although similar in performance to our current study, the previous study included DCIS patients with microinvasion, and the overall underestimation rate of DCIS patients by preoperative biopsy was 42.6% (145/340), both of which significantly decreased the difficulty of the prediction task.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The pathology features including nuclear grade and presence of comedo type necrosis were also not associated with upstaging, despite a prior meta-analysis by Brennan et al [5] which demonstrated an association with invasive cancer; however, this may be due in part to the smaller sample size included in our study. Previous investigators have looked at the predictive power of individual histologic or pathologic features [5, 6, 9, 25, 2729], but only Park et al [9] constructed a nomogram to predict the occult invasiveness of DCIS patients, and obtained an AUC-ROC of 0.71 on their validation set. Although similar in performance to our current study, the previous study included DCIS patients with microinvasion, and the overall underestimation rate of DCIS patients by preoperative biopsy was 42.6% (145/340), both of which significantly decreased the difficulty of the prediction task.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Prior studies suggested relationships between outcomes of DCIS and histologic features from pathology reports [1, 5, 6, 27, 29] or BI-RADS mammographic features [5, 2528]. Although not intended for the present task, those features nonetheless may have predictive value.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Several published articles have shown a higher underestimation rate with the automated core-needle biopsy compared to SVAB (9-11). Sim et al (17) reported that the underestimation rate of DCIS (26%) was significantly higher when preoperative biopsies were performed using core biopsy needles, compared with the lower underestimation rate of DCIS (19.9%) in biopsies obtained using VAB devices. Although SVAB allows more accurate histopathologic results, underestimation still occurs (7,10,18).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Table 1 shows that the various centres use a variety of stereotactic equipment both vertical (add-on) and horizontal. Also, SCB systems in use vary, with pros and cons for each of these systems [12]. Further analysis of this aspect is, however, outside the scope of this article.…”
Section: Mammography and Radiological Classificationmentioning
confidence: 99%