2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcin.2008.06.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Upfront Thrombus Aspiration in Primary Coronary Intervention for Patients With ST-Segment Elevation Acute Myocardial Infarction

Abstract: This study suggested the safety of primary PCI with upfront thrombectomy using a novel device in patients with STEMI. The study showed a trend toward improved myocardial perfusion and lower clinical events in patients treated with aspiration. Patients presenting late after STEMI appear to benefit the most from thrombectomy.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
101
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 143 publications
(106 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
5
101
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Hovewer, Silva-Orrego et al (44) showed that manual thrombus aspiration before primary PCI led to lower risk of distal embolization, and no reflow compared with standard primary PCI in the DEAR-MI (Dethrombosis to Enhance Acute Reperfusion in Myocardial Infarction) study. In addition, these findings were confirmed by recent studies (45,46). It is therefore likely to say that thrombus aspiration improves myocardial reperfusion and is associated with lower rate of no-reflow.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 76%
“…Hovewer, Silva-Orrego et al (44) showed that manual thrombus aspiration before primary PCI led to lower risk of distal embolization, and no reflow compared with standard primary PCI in the DEAR-MI (Dethrombosis to Enhance Acute Reperfusion in Myocardial Infarction) study. In addition, these findings were confirmed by recent studies (45,46). It is therefore likely to say that thrombus aspiration improves myocardial reperfusion and is associated with lower rate of no-reflow.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 76%
“…In this regard, the use of a mechanical device for thrombus removal or trapping to improve clinical outcomes after p-PCI is attractive, and the efficacy of these devices has been tested in many clinical trials. Although some data, especially those regarding the use of distal protection devices, have failed to show clinical benefits due in part to patient and device selection [48][49][50][51][52][53] , many recent large-scale randomized trials have demonstrated significant improvements in myocardial perfusion 45,[54][55][56][57][58][59][60][61][62][63][64][65][66][67] and the left ventricular function 64,65) in addition to reduced mortality 68) ( 69) . In addition, Burzotta et 70) .…”
Section: Thrombus Aspiration/distal Protection Therapy and Its Efficacymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…22 The VAMPIRE study showed that the application of thrombus aspiration during emergency PCI did not increase surgical complexity or extend the operation time, and that thrombus aspiration devices could improve the microcirculation of patients with STEMI myocardial reperfusion compared with conventional PCI. 23 The JETSTENT study suggested that, in cases of STEMI with obvious thrombosis in coronary angiography, thrombus aspiration in the infarct-related artery before routine stent implantation would significantly improve myocardial perfusion and reduce the 6-month follow-up MACE. 24 Among patients with a relatively long lag time between infarction and PCI, to prevent distal embolization and no/slow reflow, active thrombus aspiration should be used to clear thrombi or plaque material (especially within the molecular constituents of plaque) if the patient has a TIMI flow grade is 0-1 or 2-3 and severe stenosis.…”
Section: Findingmentioning
confidence: 99%