2020
DOI: 10.1177/1591019920982816
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Upfront middle meningeal artery embolization for treatment of chronic subdural hematomas in patients with or without midline shift

Abstract: Objectives There is limited data on upfront middle meningeal artery (MMA) embolization in the context of significant midline shift (MLS) (greater than 5mm) for the treatment of chronic subdural hematomas (cSDH). This study reports the temporal changes following MMA embolization as an upfront treatment of cSDH in patients with or without MLS and either mild, no symptoms or mild and stable neurological deficits. Methods A retrospective series of patients with a cSDH from a single institution in the United States… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
22
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
(29 reference statements)
0
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Also, as seen in Table 2, the mean MLS for our patients was 6.75 mm. The MMA embolization has a delayed effect with an average time to resolution of MLS to be 46 days for MLS < 5 mm and 51 days for MLS>5 mm (38). The recent findings with MMA embolization suggest that the mechanism is via devascularization of the outer membranes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Also, as seen in Table 2, the mean MLS for our patients was 6.75 mm. The MMA embolization has a delayed effect with an average time to resolution of MLS to be 46 days for MLS < 5 mm and 51 days for MLS>5 mm (38). The recent findings with MMA embolization suggest that the mechanism is via devascularization of the outer membranes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Most reports are cautious about using MMA up front in cases where there is significant mass effect or neurological deficits. A midline shift of >5 mm or motor strength of 4/5 contralateral to the cSDH has been used as a guideline to avoid MMA embolization (25,38). As seen in Table 1, all of our patients except for two presented with symptoms/complaints that were concerning enough that they came to our ED.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From the analysis of the literature, we identified four indications for MMA embolization: To prevent surgery in patients with paucisymptomatic CSDHs,[ 7 , 9 , 13 - 15 , 19 , 20 , 24 , 35 - 37 , 48 , 50 , 51 ] As prophylaxis of a recurrence after a first surgery,[ 5 , 7 , 9 , 14 , 19 , 24 , 34 - 37 , 41 , 42 , 50 ] After a first recurrence to prevent further recurrence,[ 9 , 13 , 17 - 21 , 23 , 24 , 28 , 37 , 43 , 48 , 51 , 54 ] As an adjunctive treatment in case of a second surgery. [ 10 , 17 , 25 , 26 , 28 , 33 , 47 ] …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To prevent surgery in patients with paucisymptomatic CSDHs,[ 7 , 9 , 13 - 15 , 19 , 20 , 24 , 35 - 37 , 48 , 50 , 51 ]…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Gomez-Paz et al (2020) were able to show that upfront MMA embolization in CSDH with a midline shift is feasible. In their series of 23 patients, improvement was achieved within 2–4 weeks, and resolution occurred within less than 2 months [ 56 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%