2004
DOI: 10.2136/sh2004.2.0062
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Updating Soil Depth Class Information in North Dakota with Ground-Penetrating Radar

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2006
2006

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 1 publication
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Depths to subsurface interfaces could be misplaced by 30 cm or more without proper placement of the soil surface on the GPR profile. While relatively small, this error could be important for near‐surface investigations where accurate depth measurements are important, such as evaluating soil suitability for septic systems or determining soil depth (Doolittle et al, 2004) or depth to diagnostic soil horizons. In our case, we were using GPR surveys to determine whether and where drainage ditches may have penetrated thin (30‐cm‐thick) clay layers in a wetland restoration site (Szuch et al, 2006).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Depths to subsurface interfaces could be misplaced by 30 cm or more without proper placement of the soil surface on the GPR profile. While relatively small, this error could be important for near‐surface investigations where accurate depth measurements are important, such as evaluating soil suitability for septic systems or determining soil depth (Doolittle et al, 2004) or depth to diagnostic soil horizons. In our case, we were using GPR surveys to determine whether and where drainage ditches may have penetrated thin (30‐cm‐thick) clay layers in a wetland restoration site (Szuch et al, 2006).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%