2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2012.12.040
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Updating process of internal models of action as assessed from motor and postural strategies in children

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This was evidenced in the CP youth having lower percentages of postural muscle bursting activity in the posterior muscles. While there were no differences observed in the tibialis anterior and quadriceps between CP and TD groups, this may be a result of leaning forward to counteract the movement of the platform and allow the inertia of the body to return the center of mass to a stable position [20]. Previous research has also established youth with CP to have poorly organized muscle activation [11,32].…”
Section: Youth With Cp Make Better Use Of Anticipatory Mechanisms In mentioning
confidence: 78%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This was evidenced in the CP youth having lower percentages of postural muscle bursting activity in the posterior muscles. While there were no differences observed in the tibialis anterior and quadriceps between CP and TD groups, this may be a result of leaning forward to counteract the movement of the platform and allow the inertia of the body to return the center of mass to a stable position [20]. Previous research has also established youth with CP to have poorly organized muscle activation [11,32].…”
Section: Youth With Cp Make Better Use Of Anticipatory Mechanisms In mentioning
confidence: 78%
“…The number of steps taken was counted for each frequency. The anchoring index (AI) was used to determine the stabilization of the head with respect to both external space and the trunk [12,20] and was calculated as follows:…”
Section: Outcome Measuresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Specifically, changes in movement perception may be indicative of the recalibration of our predictive internal models, which associate our motor commands with their expected perceptual consequences. Data from several groups suggest that internal models are not yet fully developed in school-aged children 3840 , especially for complex tasks requiring balance 41 , such as walking. More specifically, the association between an action and its sensory consequences may not be recalibrated as flexibly in children as in adults 42 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Essentially, adolescents may have a diminished ability to detect errors in their selected motor actions because their interpretation of the sensory feedback is less precise and delayed 8,9,1316 . Alternatively, other investigations have hypothesized that the motor control differences may not be related to the quality of the sensory feedback, but rather adolescents are less experienced at properly weighting all of the available sensory feedback during a movement ( i.e .., muscle spindle, joint position, visual tracking) 1012 . While both of these hypotheses are plausible, limited efforts have been made to determine if there is a connection between the somatosensory cortical processing and the motor actions seen in adolescents.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%