2017
DOI: 10.5152/tjg.2017.16721
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Updating predictors of endoscopic recurrence after ileocolic resection for Crohn disease

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
48
0
5

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(53 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
48
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…The following variables were used to define risk based on a suspected high pretest probability of affecting disease severity or demonstration of a trend towards significance in univariate analysis: age, [14][15][16][17][18] gender, smoking, [14][15][16]18 disease behavior, 14,15 disease duration, 16,18 steroid use, 17,19 extent of resection, need for recurrent surgery, need for anti-TNFα therapy, need for alternative classes of biologic therapy, indication for change in biologic therapy, and most recent endoscopic activity. 16 Included variables that have also been associated with postoperative recurrence include smoking, [20][21][22][23] disease behavior, [24][25][26] shorter disease duration, [27][28][29] and prior resection. 6,30,31 All input variables were agreed upon by the research team.…”
Section: Composite Risk Scorementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The following variables were used to define risk based on a suspected high pretest probability of affecting disease severity or demonstration of a trend towards significance in univariate analysis: age, [14][15][16][17][18] gender, smoking, [14][15][16]18 disease behavior, 14,15 disease duration, 16,18 steroid use, 17,19 extent of resection, need for recurrent surgery, need for anti-TNFα therapy, need for alternative classes of biologic therapy, indication for change in biologic therapy, and most recent endoscopic activity. 16 Included variables that have also been associated with postoperative recurrence include smoking, [20][21][22][23] disease behavior, [24][25][26] shorter disease duration, [27][28][29] and prior resection. 6,30,31 All input variables were agreed upon by the research team.…”
Section: Composite Risk Scorementioning
confidence: 99%
“…2 studies [ 16 , 20 ] mentioned disease localization at ileocolic resection. Due to low heterogeneity (I 2 = 31.4%, P = 0.227), a random-effects model was utilized, and the result suggested that disease localization at ileocolic resection was a risk factor for ePOR, with statistical significance [OR = 2.68, 95% CI (1.38, 5.22), P = 0.004] (Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…9 studies [ 13 , 16 18 , 24 , 25 , 29 , 31 , 34 ] mentioned perianal disease. Due to low heterogeneity (I 2 = 46.5%, P = 0.060), a random-effects model was utilized, and the result demonstrated that perianal disease was a risk index for ePOR, with marked difference [OR = 1.47, 95% CI (1.07, 2.03), P = 0.017] (Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations