2011
DOI: 10.1080/01431161.2011.605087
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Updating landslide inventory maps using Persistent Scatterer Interferometry (PSI)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
101
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 123 publications
(104 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
2
101
0
Order By: Relevance
“…PSI technique is not a stand-alone technique, and it must be considered as a complementary support to the analyses of the areas affected by slope instability. Ground movement evidence obtained from radar data need always to be validated and compared as much as possible with other kinds of techniques and auxiliary information, in order to achieve a reliable investigation (FARINA et al 2006;RIGHINI et al 2012). Thus, the combined use of radar data with traditional geomorphological tools like photo-interpretation, field surveys and in situ campaigns give useful effort for the mapping and monitoring of the impacts of landslide phenomena on buildings and manufactures of the investigated sites PARCHARIDIS et al 2010;CIGNA et al 2011;TAPETE et al 2012;FRATTINI et al 2013).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…PSI technique is not a stand-alone technique, and it must be considered as a complementary support to the analyses of the areas affected by slope instability. Ground movement evidence obtained from radar data need always to be validated and compared as much as possible with other kinds of techniques and auxiliary information, in order to achieve a reliable investigation (FARINA et al 2006;RIGHINI et al 2012). Thus, the combined use of radar data with traditional geomorphological tools like photo-interpretation, field surveys and in situ campaigns give useful effort for the mapping and monitoring of the impacts of landslide phenomena on buildings and manufactures of the investigated sites PARCHARIDIS et al 2010;CIGNA et al 2011;TAPETE et al 2012;FRATTINI et al 2013).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Radar-interpretation and photo-interpretation procedures (e.g., FARINA et al 2006;BIANCHINI et al 2012;CIGNA et al 2013;RIGHINI et al 2012) combined with a field survey allowed the mapping and characterization of landslides. In particular, on the one hand, the recognition of features related to topographic surface movements and the typology classification were mainly based on visual interpretation of orthophotos; on the other hand, the evaluation of the velocity and state of activity of phenomena took advantage from multi-interferometry-based information.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Landslide states of activity recorded within the PAI and IFFI inventories were determined by means of photointerpretation of multi-temporal aerial photographs and targeted field surveys carried out in the late 1990s. The map produced from the combination of PAI and IFFI inventories has been initially updated through photointerpretation, using aerial photos of 2003, and successively throughout radar-interpretation (Cigna, Del Ventisette, Liguori, & Casagli, 2011;Farina, Casagli, & Ferretti, 2008;Righini, Pancioli, & Casagli, 2012) using 1992 radar data. Finally, detailed geomorphological surveys were carried out in 2006, 2007 and 2011, to validate the updated geomorphological map.…”
Section: Integrated Geomorphological Mappingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A new approach for the updating of pre-existing landslide inventories has been recently developed and experimented (Farina et al 2004(Farina et al , 2006Righini et al 2012), combining traditional geomorphological thematic information (e.g. topographic, geological, land use maps, optical images) and in situ observations with ground displacement data obtained through PSI analysis.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%