2014
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.2440480
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Updating Japan's Constitutional Debate Through Dialogue with Kataoka Tetsuya and Hannah Arendt

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 21 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Middlebrooks strongly argued that Japan must abandon Article 9 of the Constitution or 'face a future it likely will be unable to defend its territory or its interests' (Middlebrooks, 2008, xiii). Mori (2014), in an article analysing the arguments for constitutional reform put forward by Tetsuya Kataoka, concluded that constitutional amendment is an urgent task of Japan to terminate her position as a 'dependent' state and establish her status as an equal ally of the United States. Japan's constitutional revision, in particular revision of Article 9, can enhance rather than worsen the regional security in East Asia (Mori, 2014, 25).…”
Section: Debate On 'Normalization' and Constitutional Revisionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Middlebrooks strongly argued that Japan must abandon Article 9 of the Constitution or 'face a future it likely will be unable to defend its territory or its interests' (Middlebrooks, 2008, xiii). Mori (2014), in an article analysing the arguments for constitutional reform put forward by Tetsuya Kataoka, concluded that constitutional amendment is an urgent task of Japan to terminate her position as a 'dependent' state and establish her status as an equal ally of the United States. Japan's constitutional revision, in particular revision of Article 9, can enhance rather than worsen the regional security in East Asia (Mori, 2014, 25).…”
Section: Debate On 'Normalization' and Constitutional Revisionmentioning
confidence: 99%