2011
DOI: 10.2136/sssaj2010.0002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Updating Conventional Soil Maps through Digital Soil Mapping

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

4
31
0
3

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

3
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 81 publications
(42 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
4
31
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…The success of SoLIM relies highly on whether the selected environmental covariates relate spatial variations of soil properties (Liu and Zhu 2009;Yang et al 2011;Zhu et al 2001). This study supports the conclusion that when some easily measured soil covariates, which affect the SOC distribution such as land-use type, topographic parameters, and surface area ratio (SAR) were put into the SoLIM model, a high accuracy SOC map can be generated.…”
Section: Methods Comparisonsupporting
confidence: 70%
“…The success of SoLIM relies highly on whether the selected environmental covariates relate spatial variations of soil properties (Liu and Zhu 2009;Yang et al 2011;Zhu et al 2001). This study supports the conclusion that when some easily measured soil covariates, which affect the SOC distribution such as land-use type, topographic parameters, and surface area ratio (SAR) were put into the SoLIM model, a high accuracy SOC map can be generated.…”
Section: Methods Comparisonsupporting
confidence: 70%
“…Bui and Moran (2001) use k-means clustering to classify soils with Landsat MSS bands, slope position and relief as predictor variables. Yang et al (2011) used fuzzy clustering to quantify soil-landscape relationships on a 1:20.000 soil map in Canada. The extracted knowledge was used for refined soil mapping using the Soil Land Inference Model SoLIM.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Run FCM on covariates (minus the geology type) for the location with high uncertainty in Geology Type 6 to identify different environment classes. Based on the coefficient (F) and entropy (H) (Zhu et al, 2008;Yang et al, 2011), the best cluster number is 5 and the fuzzy parameter m is 1.5. After hardening the cluster results, Class 1 has 40,135 cells and Class 2 through Class 5 have 20,875, 26,084, 17,585 and 11,426 cells, respectively.…”
Section: Uncertainty Reduction Stagementioning
confidence: 99%