2018
DOI: 10.7861/clinmedicine.18-1-11
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Updates in palliative care – recent advancements in the pharmacological management of symptoms

Abstract: Symptom management is an important part of both palliative care and end-of-life care. This article will examine the recent research evidence about drugs commonly used for symptom management in adult patients receiving palliative care. In particular, the management of symptoms where recent palliative care-based evidence has changed recommended practice will be reviewed. This includes: breathlessness, delirium, nausea and vomiting in bowel obstruction, opioidinduced constipation and upper respiratory tract secre… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These medications are typically prescribed to manage terminal secretions. 22 Excessive respiratory tract secretions are a common symptom that affects 23% to 92% of dying patients. 23 Although there is no evidence that these secretions are associated with respiratory distress in the patient, they are often treated in order to ease caregiver distress.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These medications are typically prescribed to manage terminal secretions. 22 Excessive respiratory tract secretions are a common symptom that affects 23% to 92% of dying patients. 23 Although there is no evidence that these secretions are associated with respiratory distress in the patient, they are often treated in order to ease caregiver distress.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous studies have administered anticholinergic drugs to treat already formed noisy RTS rather than preventing their formation, but anticholinergic drugs are unable to remove secretions already formed. 2,3 This exploratory study presents promising effects; however, the data should be interpreted in the context of its methodological limitations. The natural history of RTS is poorly described, so attribution of outcomes is difficult in an unblinded trial.…”
mentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Importantly, harms were not reported, but it is vital to know about toxicity when proposing a prophylactic treatment (potentially for the benefit of family and staff rather than the patient) [4][5][6] where a significant number of people would never develop noisy RTS (40% in comparator arm of present study) but nevertheless have now been exposed to a drug with a significant harm profile (including dry mouth, constipation, and urinary retention). 2,3 In particular, anticholinergics are known to contribute to deliriumdof concern in this high-risk population. 7 To make clinical judgments, we must be able to evaluate the net-benefit (harms-benefit balance) of exposing patients to a medication they might not need but might cause clinically important harms.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is a challenging subject encompassing moral and ethical, legal, 1 religious, 2 scientific medical 3 and managerial domains that spans primary, social and…”
Section: Clinical Medicine 2018 Vol 18 No 1: 1 Editorialmentioning
confidence: 99%