2020
DOI: 10.1029/2019ja027433
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Updated Neutron‐Monitor Yield Function: Bridging Between In Situ and Ground‐Based Cosmic Ray Measurements

Abstract: An updated yield function for a standard NM64 neutron monitor (NM) is computed and extended to different atmospheric depths from sea level to 500 g/cm 2 ( ∼5.7 km altitude) and is presented as lookup tables and a full parametrization. The yield function was validated using the cosmic ray spectra directly measured in space by the AMS‐02 experiment during the period May 2011 through May 2017 and confronted with count rates of all NM64‐type NMs being in operation during this period. Using this approach, stability… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
64
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 63 publications
(74 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
3
64
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Here, we modeled the NM response using a new NM yield function computed for several altitudes by Mishev et al [2013Mishev et al [ , 2020, which is fully consistent with the experimental latitude and altitude surveys and was recently validated by achieving good agreement between model results and space-borne with AMS 02 and ground-based NM measurements [for details see Gil et al, 2015;Lara et al, 2016;Usoskin et al, 2017;Nuntiyakul et al, 2018;Koldobskiy et al, 2019b;Mishev et al, 2020]. Therefore, the response of each NM was modeled with a yield function corresponding to the exact station's altitude a.s.l., which allowed us to reduce model uncertainties related to the application of the double-attenuation-lengths method, i.e.…”
Section: Analysis Of # Gle 71 Using Nm Recordsmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…Here, we modeled the NM response using a new NM yield function computed for several altitudes by Mishev et al [2013Mishev et al [ , 2020, which is fully consistent with the experimental latitude and altitude surveys and was recently validated by achieving good agreement between model results and space-borne with AMS 02 and ground-based NM measurements [for details see Gil et al, 2015;Lara et al, 2016;Usoskin et al, 2017;Nuntiyakul et al, 2018;Koldobskiy et al, 2019b;Mishev et al, 2020]. Therefore, the response of each NM was modeled with a yield function corresponding to the exact station's altitude a.s.l., which allowed us to reduce model uncertainties related to the application of the double-attenuation-lengths method, i.e.…”
Section: Analysis Of # Gle 71 Using Nm Recordsmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…-The method was applied to the revised GLE intensities X i, j as described above. -We used the recent NM yield function (Mishev et al 2013(Mishev et al , 2020, validated by direct comparison with the AMS-02 and 0 1 2 3 4 0 1 2 3 4 6 8 1 0 1 2 4 5 5 0 Fig. 4.…”
Section: Gle Integral Spectramentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The latter therefore depends on various parameters that are unique to each monitor (see e.g., Clem & Dorman, 2000;Caballero-Lopez, 2016). In order to reconstruct the primary cosmic ray flux, j i (P, t), the yield function must be known for a number of stations characterized by different P c values (e.g., Mishev et al, 2020). Once the atmospheric yield functions are known, continuous spectral information about cosmic ray modulation (primary spectra above the atmosphere and magnetosphere) can be obtained from neutron monitor differential response functions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%