Updated Emergency Response Guidance for the First 48 h after the Outdoor Detonation of an Explosive Radiological Dispersal Device

Abstract

VThis paper updates portions of the guidance originally published in 2006 based on the interpretation of subsequent experiments simulating explosive aerosolization from a radiological dispersal device and three-dimensional modeling of a high-rise urban-canyon type environment and wind field. These new data increase confidence about the predicted range of radioactive ballistic fragments that could endanger first responders and the public. The results of the most recent complete set of experiments indicate that the previously recommended initial hazard boundary corresponding to the potential for acute health effects can be reduced from 500 m to 250 m. This revised recommendation is independent of the total activity of the radioactive material. The assessment of the potential range and effects of dispersal from small particles as aerosol remains unchanged from the guidance issued in 2006. New recommendations are offered on sheltering versus evacuation and how to conduct the initial field measurements so as to make early decisions on protecting the public and responders, and providing coherent data for an assessment scientist to make a first estimate of the source term in the device. Health Phys. 105(1):65Y73; 2013

First Responder Safety in the Event of a Dirty Bomb Detonation in Urban Environment

“…Other than the immediate physical consequences of the explosion, the radioactive material can expose people to variable levels of radiation, and it can contaminate large areas, causing the disruption of local activities and important social effects, enhanced by the general fear of radiation [4,5]. In such an event, the intervention of first responders and the necessity of clean-up activities must be carefully planned, in order to avoid high doses to emergency workers [6][7][8].…”

Radiological Dispersal Device Shelter & Evacuation Technical Basis CalEMA RNER Framework Supplement

“…The 2013 article, "Updated Emergency Response Guidance for the First 48 H After the Outdoor Detonation of an Explosive Radiological Dispersal Device" (Musolino, 2013) demonstrates how the Exclusion Zone can be defined early in the event before the radiological extent is fully characterized.…”

Contamination Measurements from Simultaneous Activated Potassium Bromide Radiological Dispersal Devices with a Collimated Vehicular Sensor

“…Furthermore, the relatively flat ground and low amount of vegetation in the test site help to ensure accurate characterization of the ground activity. After validation in a low clutter area, these systems and methods can then be tested in a more urban environment (Musolino et al 2013).…”