2019
DOI: 10.1103/physrevc.99.055205
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Updated determination of N* resonance parameters using a unitary, multichannel formalism

Abstract: Results are presented for an updated multichannel energy-dependent partial-wave analysis of πN scattering. Our earlier work incorporated single-energy amplitudes for πN → πN , γN → πN , πN → ππN , πN → ηN , and πN → KΛ. The present work incorporates new single-energy solutions for γp → ηp up to a c.m. energy of 1990 MeV, γp → K + Λ up to a c.m. energy of 2230 MeV, and γn → ηn up to a c.m. energy of 1885 MeV, as well as updated single-energy solutions for πN → ηN , πN → KΛ, and γN → πN . In this paper, we prese… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
30
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
1
30
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our measured γn → K 0 Λ differential cross sections for case (60) and our measured K 0 yields for case (70) were [11]. The solid green curve shows a prediction [36,37] based upon a partial-wave analysis. Figure 14 shows the differential cross section for γn → K 0 Σ 0 as a function of c.m.…”
Section: γN → K 0 σmentioning
confidence: 83%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Our measured γn → K 0 Λ differential cross sections for case (60) and our measured K 0 yields for case (70) were [11]. The solid green curve shows a prediction [36,37] based upon a partial-wave analysis. Figure 14 shows the differential cross section for γn → K 0 Σ 0 as a function of c.m.…”
Section: γN → K 0 σmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…10 show results of two-parameter Legendre polynomial fits to our measurements. The solid green curves show predictions based upon a partial-wave analysis [36,37]. We have checked various factors that might affect the normalizations of our results (e.g., the photon flux N γ and detector acceptance) and have been unable to find any problems that would explain the differences between our results and the low-energy g13 results.…”
Section: γN → K 0 λmentioning
confidence: 92%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Further, there exist non-resonant background effects which we have not taken into account (see Refs. [83][84][85] for some details).…”
Section: Baryonic Resonances: the δ(1232)mentioning
confidence: 99%