2006
DOI: 10.1088/1126-6708/2006/03/033
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Updated constraints on the minimal supergravity model

Abstract: We provide an up-to-date analysis of the parameter space of the minimal supergravity model (mSUGRA). Novel features include the new central value of the top quark mass, an improved calculation of the masses of the supersymmetric particles and the neutral Higgs bosons, constraints from b → sℓ + ℓ − decays, and a careful treatment of the most important experimental and theoretical uncertainties. In addition to the by now traditional plots of the allowed region in the (m 0 , m 1/2 ) plane, we show allowed regions… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
82
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 92 publications
(88 citation statements)
references
References 101 publications
(61 reference statements)
6
82
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our choice of parameters in the m 0 − m 1/2 plane would correspond to a stau-LSP without the right-sneutrino in the (super)particle spectrum, which is ruled out in the context of χ 0 1 -LSP scenario [19]. However with the right-sneutrino as the LSP, we find this choice to be a preferable and well-motivated option.…”
Section: Right Sneutrino Lsp In Supergravitymentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Our choice of parameters in the m 0 − m 1/2 plane would correspond to a stau-LSP without the right-sneutrino in the (super)particle spectrum, which is ruled out in the context of χ 0 1 -LSP scenario [19]. However with the right-sneutrino as the LSP, we find this choice to be a preferable and well-motivated option.…”
Section: Right Sneutrino Lsp In Supergravitymentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Only taking the WMAP upper limit allows for the possibility of multicomponent dark matter [46]. Other constraints applied to the mSUGRA parameter points include the g µ − 2 [47] constraint −11.4 × 10 −10 ≤ δ (g µ − 2) ≤ 9.4 × 10 −9 and constraints from B-physics measurements [48][49][50] which yield flavor constraints from the data, i.e. 2.77 × 10 −4 ≤ Br (b → sγ) ≤ 4.37 × 10 −4 (where this branching ratio has the NNLO correction [51]) and Br (B s → µ + µ − ) ≤ 1.1 × 10 −8 .…”
Section: Higgs Mass In Minimal Sugramentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition a number of indirect experimental constraints were imposed, which include those from the Tevatron, Belle/BaBar/Cleo and Brookhaven experiments. Specifically we impose the conservative constraints (−11.4 × 10 −10 ) ≤ δ (g µ − 2) ≤ (9.4 × 10 −9 ), see [36,37], [38], and 2.77 ≤ Br (b → sγ) × 10 4 ≤ 4.27 [39].…”
Section: Analysis Of the Parameter Space And Sparticle Massesmentioning
confidence: 99%