2014
DOI: 10.7872/cryb.v35.iss3.2014.261
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Updated Checklist of the Bryophytes from the Sierra Nevada Mountains (S of Spain)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0
5

Year Published

2015
2015
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

3
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
10
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…Similarly, Rams et al. () reported finding no sporophytes in deep sampling carried out in the Sierra Nevada from early spring to autumn from 2002 to 2004, and García‐Zamora et al. () found only one fructified specimen identified as C. purpureus in a survey of a zone close to the Sierra Nevada in 1990–1991.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Similarly, Rams et al. () reported finding no sporophytes in deep sampling carried out in the Sierra Nevada from early spring to autumn from 2002 to 2004, and García‐Zamora et al. () found only one fructified specimen identified as C. purpureus in a survey of a zone close to the Sierra Nevada in 1990–1991.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…(Rams et al . ) and is also found frequently in coastal areas outside the protected area of Sierra Nevada.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The SN genotype is very abundant locally, but seems to decline rapidly in frequency northwards in the Iberian Peninsula, as it has not been found in Spanish Sistema Central or even in sites with similar Mediterranean climatic conditions, like the Sicilian Mount Etna, which is situated at almost the same latitude and has a very similar altitude as Sierra Nevada. We think that the potential distribution of the SN genotype in southern Spain is broader than presently known, as many other recorded samples from neighboring areas have been previously reported as C. purpureus or C. conicus (Martínez Sánchez & al., 1991;García-Zamora & al., 1998;Cano & al., 2010;Rams & al., 2014), but show the morphology of SN and Recombinant group samples, as observed after revision of MUB and GDA / GDAC herbaria samples. Outside southern Spanish mountains, only the Ww genotype and recombinants were found.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Burley & Pritchard (1990) and many Floras (e.g., Smith, 2004;Frey & al., 2006) described C. conicus as strictly calcicolous. Perhaps for this reason previous authors identified samples collected in Sierra Nevada as xeric forms of C. purpureus and discarded the presence of C. conicus in this area (Höhnel, 1895;Rams & al., 2014;Brugués & Ruiz, 2015). Unfortunately, Burley & Pritchard (1990) did not describe the methodology employed to elucidate the type of substrate on which the 18 representative specimens they studied grew (from Canada, England, Norway, Scotland and the United States).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%