2017
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0005269
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Update on Zika Diagnostic Tests and WHO’s Related Activities

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
31
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
31
1
Order By: Relevance
“…While it is relatively straightforward to detect ZIKV nucleic acids during the acute phase in blood, urine, saliva, and semen, it has proven more difficult to design rapid and effective diagnostics for prior ZIKV exposure (Chua et al, 2017). This is reflected by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) website where Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) has been obtained for 11 RNA-based assays and only two tests for IgM (FDA, 2017).…”
Section: Current Status Of Diagnostic Testing (Diogo M Magnani Mmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While it is relatively straightforward to detect ZIKV nucleic acids during the acute phase in blood, urine, saliva, and semen, it has proven more difficult to design rapid and effective diagnostics for prior ZIKV exposure (Chua et al, 2017). This is reflected by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) website where Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) has been obtained for 11 RNA-based assays and only two tests for IgM (FDA, 2017).…”
Section: Current Status Of Diagnostic Testing (Diogo M Magnani Mmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, care must be taken when interpreting the results of serosurveys in areas with cocirculation of other flaviviruses, or routine JE or YF vaccination. With the emergence of Zika in South America and the large epidemic observed in 2015-2016, cross-reactivity may be of particular concern since there are currently no commercially available diagnostics or internationally recognised standards for Zika diagnosis [29]. In the context of conducting serosurveys to inform dengue vaccination, WHO recommend that a subset of samples is retested using neutralisation tests such as plaque-reduction neutralisation tests (PRNTs) as they do not detect the same cross-reactivity.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Laboratory confirmation of a diagnosis for patient treatment must have sufficient clinical sensitivity and specificity to be useful, the criteria for which may be different than analytical sensitivity and specificity criteria specified by assays for use in vaccine trials. [38][39][40][41][42][43][44][45] Very few tests have gained Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) from the FDA. There are 2 MERS-CoV diagnostic tests, both molecular-based viral RNA detection, which received EUA in 2013 in response to the recognition of the significant potential for a future public health emergency.…”
Section: Diagnostics For Emerging Infectious Diseasesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…62 EID public health and countermeasure programs have unique challenges for diagnostic and vaccine clinical assay development purposes. 2,39,41,[63][64][65][66][67][68][69][70][71] There may be an incomplete understanding of the biology or epidemiology of a new pathogen, which can delay or confound the selection of a relevant vaccine target and the subsequent assay development to be used to evaluate the candidates. The field may suffer from a lack of available reagent sources or with inconsistency in quantity and quality of those available, especially early in the discovery and development process.…”
Section: Future Preparedness For Eidsmentioning
confidence: 99%