2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.vetimm.2011.05.036
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Update on the role of innate immune receptors during Brucella abortus infection

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 87 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Another report also documents selective suppression of ER stress signaling by LPS [26]. Brucella stimulates both TLR2 and TLR4 and the TLR adaptor MyD88 appears to be essential for controlling infection in vivo [27]. To further elucidate the role of TLR-MyD88 signaling in UPR induction by Brucella , XBP1 splicing and UPR target gene expression was examined in primary bone marrow derived macrophages from MyD88 deficient mice (Figure 4).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Another report also documents selective suppression of ER stress signaling by LPS [26]. Brucella stimulates both TLR2 and TLR4 and the TLR adaptor MyD88 appears to be essential for controlling infection in vivo [27]. To further elucidate the role of TLR-MyD88 signaling in UPR induction by Brucella , XBP1 splicing and UPR target gene expression was examined in primary bone marrow derived macrophages from MyD88 deficient mice (Figure 4).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Data regarding the recognition of brucellae through TLRs are ambiguous and both TLR2 and TLR4 have been reported to be involved depending on the bacterial species and strains as well as on the experimental conditions used [35]. In order to extend these results to S19, we employed a TLR overexpression system based on the human embryonal kidney cell line HEK293 that is usually unresponsive to bacterial stimuli [34], and analyzed TLR4/MD2, TLR2/TLR1, and TLR2/TLR6 heterodimers.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Whether non-leukocytes, e.g., endothelial cells that produce pro-inflammatory cytokines in response to the infection with B. abortus in vitro [58], contribute to the induction of specific immune responses in vivo needs to be determined. Other receptors possibly involved in S19-induced DC-activation comprise cytosolic receptors recognizing bacterial nucleic acids, e.g., those of the Rig-I like receptor (RLR) family, or other yet undefined DNA sensor receptors [35].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At this time, we cannot discern whether clearance of the Δ rpoE1 strain is mediated or enhanced by these antibodies, or if antibody production is simply a consequence of antigen release triggered by host clearance of Δ rpoE1 by innate or cell-mediated mechanisms known to control Brucella spp. infection in mice (43, 45-48). …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%