“…The role of combination therapy with a macrolide has been evaluated in several studies including patients with CAP . Previous studies report that mortality was lower in patients with severe CAP who received non‐antipseudomonal β‐lactam plus macrolide combination therapy (BLM) than in those who received other regimens such as non‐antipseudomonal β‐lactam monotherapy (BL) .…”
In patients with community-onset pneumonia at low DRP risk, BLM treatment reduced 30-day mortality compared with BL. Independent risk factors for mortality are potential confounding factors when assessing antibiotic effects in randomized clinical trials.
“…The role of combination therapy with a macrolide has been evaluated in several studies including patients with CAP . Previous studies report that mortality was lower in patients with severe CAP who received non‐antipseudomonal β‐lactam plus macrolide combination therapy (BLM) than in those who received other regimens such as non‐antipseudomonal β‐lactam monotherapy (BL) .…”
In patients with community-onset pneumonia at low DRP risk, BLM treatment reduced 30-day mortality compared with BL. Independent risk factors for mortality are potential confounding factors when assessing antibiotic effects in randomized clinical trials.
“…It is well known that macrolides have immunomodulatory effects on inflammatory and epithelial cells, which can lead to attenuation of inflammatory response (8). In addition, a retrospective observational cohort study reported that combined BL-F therapy as an empirical therapy for severe CAP was associated with increased 30-day mortality when compared with other guideline-concordant antimicrobial regimens (19).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, macrolides provide broader antibacterial spectrum for CAP because macrolides are generally effective against the main atypical pathogens such as Mycoplasma pneumoniae and Legionella (24). Second, as described above, macrolides exert immunomodulatory effects on inflammatory and epithelial cells (8). Third, antimicrobial synergism is attained by addition of a macrolide to β-lactam.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, a β-lactam-based combination therapy is preferred for patients with severe CAP (58). Additionally, recent pooled analyses showed that addition of macrolides, which has been often used to cover atypical pathogens of CAP, was associated with reduction of mortality (910).…”
Adding either macrolide or fluoroquinolone (FQ) to β-lactam has been recommended for patients with severe community-acquired pneumonia (CAP). However, due to the limited evidence available, there is a question as to the superiority of the two combination therapies. The MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Central Register, Scopus, and Web of Science databases were searched for systematic review and meta-analysis. A total of eight trials were analyzed. The total number of patients in the β-lactam plus macrolide (BL-M) and β-lactam plus fluoroquinolone (BL-F) groups was 2,273 and 1,600, respectively. Overall mortality of the BL-M group was lower than that of the BL-F group (19.4% vs. 26.8%), which showed statistical significance (odds ratio [OR], 0.68; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.49 to 0.94; P = 0.02). Length of hospital stay was reduced in the BL-M group compared to the BL-F group (mean difference, −3.05 days; 95% CI, −6.01 to −0.09; P = 0.04). However, there was no significant difference in length of intensive care unit (ICU) stay between the two groups. Among patients with severe CAP, BL-M therapy may better reduce overall mortality and length of hospital stay than BL-F therapy. However, we could not elicit strong conclusions from the available trials due to high risk of bias and methodological limitations.
“…Acknowledging the complexity of disease processes and living organisms in general, a shift from a “single drug, single target” concept toward attempts to affect whole biological networks is been arising within biomolecular screening [66], and increased understanding on the pharmacology of classical antibiotics also implies that their in vivo efficacy does not rely only on limiting bacterial replication, but also on immunomodulatory and potentially other activities [67]. Combination treatments and multifaceted therapy approaches can thus be expected to increase their popularity within antibacterials and other therapy areas, and C. pneumoniae cannot be expected to be an exception to this phenomenon.…”
Throughout its known history, the gram-negative bacterium Chlamydia pneumoniae has remained a challenging target for antibacterial chemotherapy and drug discovery. Owing to its well-known propensity for persistence and recent reports on antimicrobial resistence within closely related species, new approaches for targeting this ubiquitous human pathogen are urgently needed. In this review, we describe the strategies that have been successfully applied for the identification of nonconventional antichlamydial agents, including target-based and ligand-based virtual screening, ethnopharmacological approach and pharmacophore-based design of antimicrobial peptide-mimicking compounds. Among the antichlamydial agents identified via these strategies, most translational work has been carried out with plant phenolics. Thus, currently available data on their properties as antichlamydial agents are described, highlighting their potential mechanisms of action. In this context, the role of mitogen-activated protein kinase activation in the intracellular growth and survival of C. pneumoniae is discussed. Owing to the complex and often complementary pathways applied by C. pneumoniae in the different stages of its life cycle, multitargeted therapy approaches are expected to provide better tools for antichlamydial therapy than agents with a single molecular target.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.