2016
DOI: 10.1055/s-0036-1579882
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Update on Surgical Outcomes of Lateral Temporal Bone Resection for Ear and Temporal Bone Malignancies

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
5
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
1
5
1
Order By: Relevance
“…These figures are comparable to previously published outcomes. 1,4,24 Although the present study did not find a statistically significant reduction in OS and DSS in patients with N+ disease, despite a reduction in mean survival, there are data to suggest poorer prognosis in patients with lymph node involvement. 1,25 The failure of the present study to demonstrate this difference most likely arises from the limited sample size.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 89%
“…These figures are comparable to previously published outcomes. 1,4,24 Although the present study did not find a statistically significant reduction in OS and DSS in patients with N+ disease, despite a reduction in mean survival, there are data to suggest poorer prognosis in patients with lymph node involvement. 1,25 The failure of the present study to demonstrate this difference most likely arises from the limited sample size.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 89%
“…When surgeons chose the radical surgery such as subtotal resection of the temporal bone, expert techniques were needed because of its rarity and the complex anatomy of the temporal bone involving critical organs, such as the internal carotid artery, cranial nerves, dura mater, and brain. Moreover, negative margin of the surgical specimens was harder to get than that in other head and neck cancers such as oral, pharyngeal, and laryngeal cancers 4,8,15–17 . However, effective CRT has not been obvious thus far because of the rarity of this disease.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lateral temporal bone resection (LTBR) with or without concurrent parotidectomy and selective neck dissection (SND) is designed to remove the primary tumor en bloc as well as to microscopically stage the disease and determine the need for postoperative chemo-and/or radiation therapy. [4][5][6] While the histologic diagnosis of EAC SCC is straightforward, precise identification of genomic features that may contribute to the particularly aggressive nature of these tumors is unclear. Molecular markers may improve prognostic significance and when combined with surgical staging (Pittsburgh classification), may provide insight into optimal management of these rare and aggressive tumors.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%