2011
DOI: 10.1002/dc.21794
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Update on Liposarcoma: A review for cytopathologists

Abstract: Liposarcoma (LS) represents the most common type of soft tissue sarcoma. LS is subdivided into four distinct subtypes: well-differentiated, myxoid/round cell, pleomorphic, and mixed LS. In addition to distinctive morphology, each of the subgroups has a different prognosis and treatment strategy. While subgrouping has traditionally been based on conventional morphology, recent molecular and cytogenetic findings have validated the current classification system. Well-differentiated LS is characterized by overexpr… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
87
0
4

Year Published

2013
2013
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 61 publications
(91 citation statements)
references
References 107 publications
(23 reference statements)
0
87
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Liposarcomas are malignant adipocytic solid tumors representing a heterogeneous group of lesions classified into 4 major types by the World Health Organization DOI: 10.1159/000486333 (WHO): atypical lipoma/well-differentiated liposarcoma, and myxoid, pleomorphic, and dedifferentiated liposarcoma [15]. Because of the strong correlation between tumor prognosis and aggressiveness in localized liposarcomas, tumor grading constitutes an extremely important approach for decision-making in treatment.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Liposarcomas are malignant adipocytic solid tumors representing a heterogeneous group of lesions classified into 4 major types by the World Health Organization DOI: 10.1159/000486333 (WHO): atypical lipoma/well-differentiated liposarcoma, and myxoid, pleomorphic, and dedifferentiated liposarcoma [15]. Because of the strong correlation between tumor prognosis and aggressiveness in localized liposarcomas, tumor grading constitutes an extremely important approach for decision-making in treatment.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, recent studies underline the higher FISH sensitivity for MDM2 amplification as a diagnostic solution in difficult lipomatous tumors [24]. Besides that, other cytogenetic studies would help establishing a definitive diagnosis, like the identification of the fusion gene FUS-CHOP in myxoid liposarcomas [15].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, these subtypes are also associated with a slightly different patient prognosis. The 5-year overall survival of well-differentiated LS, dedifferentiated LS, myxoid LS were 93.3%, 54.4% and 75.7%, respectively [9,10]. It is noteworthy that some distinctive molecular signatures are shown in the common subtypes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…It is noteworthy that some distinctive molecular signatures are shown in the common subtypes. About 90% of the well/ dedifferentiated LS demonstrate significant overexpression of oncogene MDM2 [10]. Myxoid/round cell LS is characterized by the chromosome rearrangement, t(12; 16)(q13;p11), which results in the FUS-DDIT3 gene fusion [9,10].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…6 The World Health Organization divides LPS into 5 histologic subtypes, which can be grouped into 3 broad conceptual categories as follows: atypical lipomatous tumor (ALT)/well-differentiated LPS and dedifferentiated LPS; myxoid LPS; and pleomorphic LPS. 4,7 The first category, including both ALT and dedifferentiated LPS, is the most common LPS subgroup comprising 50% of all cases. 8 Atypical lipomatous tumors are locally aggressive but lack metastatic potential.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%