2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.pmrj.2015.10.012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Update on Brain Tumors: New Developments in Neuro‐oncologic Diagnosis and Treatment, and Impact on Rehabilitation Strategies

Abstract: Brain tumors can be a source of functional impairment to patients due to neurologic sequelae associated with the tumor itself as well as treatment side effects. As a result, many of these patients may require rehabilitation services. Surgery, chemotherapy, and radiation therapy have been longstanding, primary treatment modalities in the management of brain tumors, though these treatments continue to evolve given new developments in research and technology. A better understanding of the diagnostic workup and cu… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0
2

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 102 publications
0
8
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…This study did not evaluate the cost‐effectiveness of rehabilitation of brain tumor patients, which will be important to analyze in future studies. In admitting individuals with brain tumors to rehabilitation hospitals, health care institutions will have to consider the cost of a higher rate of transfer to the acute care hospitalizations as well as the need for ongoing oncology services during acute rehabilitation admission necessitating hospital transportation . However, use of telehealth in the IRF setting could negate this additional expense of attending oncology appointments in stand‐alone IRFs .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This study did not evaluate the cost‐effectiveness of rehabilitation of brain tumor patients, which will be important to analyze in future studies. In admitting individuals with brain tumors to rehabilitation hospitals, health care institutions will have to consider the cost of a higher rate of transfer to the acute care hospitalizations as well as the need for ongoing oncology services during acute rehabilitation admission necessitating hospital transportation . However, use of telehealth in the IRF setting could negate this additional expense of attending oncology appointments in stand‐alone IRFs .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It aids in the differentiation of Tumors, radiation necrosis, and normal brain. The combination of CT and PET scans reveals the anatomy (from the CT scan) and functions (from the PET scan) of the brain [10,30,31].…”
Section: Petmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Neurological and musculoskeletal impairments resulting from the tumor itself, or from radiation therapy, chemotherapy, or surgery, are quite amenable to rehabilitation management and can have a significant and lasting positive impact on function and quality of life 2‐4 . With an estimated 17 million cancer survivors as of early 2019, 5 there can be little question that the future role of rehabilitation medicine in the care of oncology patients will only expand 6 . Among the various treatment settings, the best evidence is for inpatient rehabilitation with demonstrable improvement in function in a number of cancer diagnoses, 7‐11 even in the presence of metastatic disease 12 …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%