2011
DOI: 10.1021/cr100360b
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Update 1 of: Mass Accommodation and Chemical Reactions at Gas−Liquid Interfaces

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

3
113
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 72 publications
(116 citation statements)
references
References 284 publications
3
113
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The location of a reaction is Journal Name ARTICLE determined by the accessible thickness of liquid for the reacting system. 59 A key question emerges: What determines the accessible liquid thickness for OH reacting with squalane? The simplest measure of this thickness is the reacto-diffusion length calculated using the diffusion coefficient (DOH) for OH in the liquid particle, and its pseudo-first order abstraction rate constant as a time interval Δtabs for the mean distance that OH diffuses prior to reaction, D OH Δ t |¿| L OH =√¿ .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The location of a reaction is Journal Name ARTICLE determined by the accessible thickness of liquid for the reacting system. 59 A key question emerges: What determines the accessible liquid thickness for OH reacting with squalane? The simplest measure of this thickness is the reacto-diffusion length calculated using the diffusion coefficient (DOH) for OH in the liquid particle, and its pseudo-first order abstraction rate constant as a time interval Δtabs for the mean distance that OH diffuses prior to reaction, D OH Δ t |¿| L OH =√¿ .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The most recent evaluation of experimental and theoretical results within the atmospheric science community on this subject has been compiled by , Garrett et al (2006) and updated by Kolb et al (2010) and Davidovits et al (2011). This debate has been initiated by the conflicting results between H 2 O uptake experiments to a train of droplets (Li et al, 2001) and one cloud droplet growth experiment and involved consideration of mass transfer aspects in the gas phase but also questions around energy dissipation in the condensed phase.…”
Section: Comments On Preferred Valuesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The data of Zientara et al (2008) obtained on a stationary droplet are consistent with a negative T dependence of α b and α t = 1. Other evaporation rate measurements were inconclusive about the temperature dependence (Smith et al, 2006;Drisdell et al, 2008). Although the emphasis of the work of Cappa et al (2005) was placed on obtaining (H/D) isotope fractionation ratios, the cooling of the microjet along the axis was used to derive E a = 55 kJ mol −1 for the evaporation rate of H 2 O which is approximately 10 kJ mol −1 larger than H vap .…”
Section: Comments On Preferred Valuesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Heterogeneous interactions of trace gases with particles in the atmosphere (and with all surfaces) are very complex and usually consist of several steps (Davidovits et al, 2011;Pöschl et al, 2007): (1) gas molecules diffuse towards the surface; (2) gas molecules collide with the surface, and some are then accommodated on the surface; (3) molecules adsorbed on the surface can desorb from the surface, undergo reactions on the surface or diffuse into the bulk, and get dissolved and/or react with other species in the bulk; (4) gaseous products formed in the heterogeneous reactions can diffuse towards the surface, desorb from the surface, and finally diffuse into the gas phase. The overall kinetics of a heterogeneous reaction can be described by the uptake coefficient, γ , which is the net probability that a molecule X undergoing collision with a surface is actually taken up by the surface.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The uptake of a trace gas onto the surface can cause depletion of the trace gas close to the surface, leading to an effective uptake coefficient, γ eff , which is smaller than the true uptake coefficient, γ . The relation between γ eff and γ , under appropriate steady-state assumptions, can be described by the following equation (Davidovits et al, 1995(Davidovits et al, , 2011:…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%