2007
DOI: 10.1021/cr078014b
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Update 1 of: Electrophilicity Index

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
212
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 583 publications
(229 citation statements)
references
References 397 publications
1
212
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this article we have made an attempt to study the binding of hydrogen with a host of transition metal (M) -ethylene (C 2 H 4 ) complexes [M n -(C 2 H 4 ) (M = Sc, Ti, Fe, Ni; n = 1, 2)] on the basic premise of conceptual density functional theory (CDFT) [22][23][24][25] and its various allied global reactivity descriptors like electronegativity [26][27][28] (χ), hardness [29][30][31] (η), electrophilicity [32][33][34] (ω) and the local variants like atomic charges [35] (Q k ) and Fukui functions [36] (f k ). [21] interaction between the metal atom and the interacting dihydrogen moieties.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this article we have made an attempt to study the binding of hydrogen with a host of transition metal (M) -ethylene (C 2 H 4 ) complexes [M n -(C 2 H 4 ) (M = Sc, Ti, Fe, Ni; n = 1, 2)] on the basic premise of conceptual density functional theory (CDFT) [22][23][24][25] and its various allied global reactivity descriptors like electronegativity [26][27][28] (χ), hardness [29][30][31] (η), electrophilicity [32][33][34] (ω) and the local variants like atomic charges [35] (Q k ) and Fukui functions [36] (f k ). [21] interaction between the metal atom and the interacting dihydrogen moieties.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The first four descriptors, obtained using the semiempirical AM1 methods, are molecular properties known to be useful for predicting electrophilic reactivity. [22][23][24]32,33 However, none of these molecular descriptors correlated with the k values for the dithiin−GSH reactions in a statistically significant manner (p > 0.05), suggesting that they are not suitable for the prediction of dithiin electrophilicity.…”
Section: Correlations Of Nucleophilic Susceptibility Of Dithiins Withmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Single point energies in water were calculated for these conformers using AM1 Hamiltonian and restricted Hartree-Fock formalism on TSAR version 3.3 software (Oxford Molecular, Oxford, UK). The respective values of E HOMO and E LUMO were then used to compute the absolute difference between E HOMO and E LUMO (|E HOMO [22][23][24] Calculation of electrostatic atomic charges Q of the dithiins was performed on optimized geometries using the semi-empirical AM1 Hamiltonian method on Spartan software. Taft's polar substituent constants * obtained from the literature 25 were used for appropriate substituents of the dithiins.…”
Section: Reactivity Correlation Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, to calculate the reactivity descriptors the MolReactivity program, version 1.0 (2014) made by our research group [136][137][138][139][140], was used, taking into account (1)- (18), in order to characterize the interaction energy from closed-shell (steric) repulsion, CT from occupied-vacant orbital interactions, and polarization effects, among other reaction parameters. Finally, the MPWB1K hybrid metafunctional was used due to that it is a general functional that includes covalent, partial (TS), hydrogen, and weak bonds.…”
Section: Computational Detailsmentioning
confidence: 99%