2020
DOI: 10.1086/704756
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Upcoding: Evidence from Medicare on Squishy Risk Adjustment

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
73
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 129 publications
(91 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
4
73
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Second, the MEPS provides comprehensive information on socioeconomic and health status, which are associated with rates of health services use but are imperfectly captured in claims data. Third, clinician coding patterns may be associated with differences in health risks as constructed from claims data; studies from 2014 23 and 2020 24 suggest differences in coding between MA and TM. However, the MEPS offers self-reported health status, which allowed us to control for a measure of health that is comparable across TM and MA populations.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Second, the MEPS provides comprehensive information on socioeconomic and health status, which are associated with rates of health services use but are imperfectly captured in claims data. Third, clinician coding patterns may be associated with differences in health risks as constructed from claims data; studies from 2014 23 and 2020 24 suggest differences in coding between MA and TM. However, the MEPS offers self-reported health status, which allowed us to control for a measure of health that is comparable across TM and MA populations.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a result, diagnosis codes can create ambiguities because of overlap and hierarchy in codes. Moreover, facilities have incentives to underreport (81) and overreport (85,86) outcomes, yielding differences in model representations.…”
Section: Clinical Diagnosismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While perfect risk adjustment is a useful thought experiment, most markets include an imperfect form of risk adjustment where transfers are based on individual risk scores computed from diagnoses appearing in health insurance claims. (See Geruso and Layton (2015) for an overview.) For instance, in the ACA Marketplaces, the per-enrollee transfer to plan j is determined by the following formula: 19 T j (P) = R j (P) R(P) − 1 • P(P) (9)…”
Section: Risk Adjustment Transfersmentioning
confidence: 99%