1988
DOI: 10.1212/wnl.38.8.1329
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Upbeat nystagmus and the ventral tegmental pathway of the upward vestibulo‐ocular reflex

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
19
0

Year Published

1991
1991
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 64 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Indeed, the previously reported cases of pontine lesions with UBN involved extensive bilateral damage to the ventral tegmentum and the posterior part of the basis pontis [3][4][5] . Thus, the location of this lesion would appear to support the hypothesis that the CVTT, transmitting upward vestibular signals to the third nucleus, also exists in humans [6] . The medial longitudinal fasciculus (MLF) and the brachium conjunctivum (BC), which are also involved in upward slow eye movement transmission [1,2] , were not affected here since they are located in the paramedian and lateral parts, respectively, of the posterior pontine tegmentum, and thus at a distance from the lesion.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 63%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Indeed, the previously reported cases of pontine lesions with UBN involved extensive bilateral damage to the ventral tegmentum and the posterior part of the basis pontis [3][4][5] . Thus, the location of this lesion would appear to support the hypothesis that the CVTT, transmitting upward vestibular signals to the third nucleus, also exists in humans [6] . The medial longitudinal fasciculus (MLF) and the brachium conjunctivum (BC), which are also involved in upward slow eye movement transmission [1,2] , were not affected here since they are located in the paramedian and lateral parts, respectively, of the posterior pontine tegmentum, and thus at a distance from the lesion.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 63%
“…In the pons, the lesions were large and bilateral [3][4][5] , resulting in a coarse UBN of about 10° amplitude in the primary position [5] . It has been hypothesized that these pontine lesions interrupt the excitatory 'crossing ventral tegmental tract' (CVTT) connecting the superior vestibular nucleus, involved in the transmission of anterior canal inputs, to the superior rectus and inferior oblique motoneurons in the third nerve nucleus [6] . We report a case of UBN resulting from a small unilateral pontine lesion, which supports the above hypothesis and improves our knowledge of the brainstem upward vestibular pathways.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is also a fixation-induced nystagmus that beats upward in primary gaze position, and is combined with a disorder of the vertical smooth pursuit eye movements, a visual and vestibulospinal ataxia with a tendency to fall backward, and pastpointing downward [2,4,13,19]. On the one hand, the pathoanatomical location of most acute lesions is near the median plane in the medulla oblongata in neurons of the paramedian tract (PMT), close to the caudal part of the perihypoglossal nucleus [15,19,20], which are responsible for vertical gaze-holding [21] (Fig. 2).…”
Section: Vestibular Syndromes In the Sagittal (Pitch) Planementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Wray and colleagues [7] suggest imbalance of central otolithic projections from autoimmune attack on the nodulus and ventral uvula, based on the fact that their patient's nystagmus was "strongly dependent on head position," meaning that the upbeat nystagmus was absent in the supine position, and supine positional testing on either side provoked apogeotropic nystagmus. In our case this positional dependence was absent, so we are inclined towards Pierrot-Deseilligny and colleagues' hypothesis [9] that upbeat nystagmus results from dysfunction of the crossing ventral tegmental tract [10]. Paraneoplastic diseases involving the central nervous system are thought to affect surface neuronal antigens [11] but why the crossing ventral tegmental tract should exhibit selective vulnerability to paraneoplastic antibodies in this case is unknown.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 51%