2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2009.07.615
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

UP-1.168: Voiding and Erectile Functions after Anastomotic Urethroplasty

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Two authors independently extracted predetermined categorical information data from the selected articles. This information included: study dates; number and age of patients; mean stricture length; location of the stricture; type of urethroplasty performed; number of patients with de novo ED after urethroplasty; whether or not this ED resolved during the timeframe of the study; length of study follow‐up; whether or not all patients were questioned about erectile function; whether or not patients were questioned about erectile function before their operation; whether or not a standardized questionnaire such as the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF) was used; and whether the study was prospective or retrospective (Table ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Two authors independently extracted predetermined categorical information data from the selected articles. This information included: study dates; number and age of patients; mean stricture length; location of the stricture; type of urethroplasty performed; number of patients with de novo ED after urethroplasty; whether or not this ED resolved during the timeframe of the study; length of study follow‐up; whether or not all patients were questioned about erectile function; whether or not patients were questioned about erectile function before their operation; whether or not a standardized questionnaire such as the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF) was used; and whether the study was prospective or retrospective (Table ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%