2012
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-33481-8_13
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

UOWHFs from OWFs: Trading Regularity for Efficiency

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
8
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
1
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Note that the bound given in [5] does not say anything for the mere construction of a UOWHF (e.g., for a function which compresses one bit), and prior to our work it would have been possible to conjecture that there exists a construction of a UOWHF from a general one-way function that makes only one call to the underlying one-way function. Our bound matches exactly and up to a log-factor the number of calls made by the constructions of [4] and [1], respectively.…”
Section: Our Contributionsupporting
confidence: 53%
“…Note that the bound given in [5] does not say anything for the mere construction of a UOWHF (e.g., for a function which compresses one bit), and prior to our work it would have been possible to conjecture that there exists a construction of a UOWHF from a general one-way function that makes only one call to the underlying one-way function. Our bound matches exactly and up to a log-factor the number of calls made by the constructions of [4] and [1], respectively.…”
Section: Our Contributionsupporting
confidence: 53%
“…Ames et al [1] presented an even more efficient construction of UOWHFs from (unknown) regular one-way functions. Barhum and Maurer [2] gave even a more efficient construction assuming the regularity of the one-way function is known, where Yu et al [32] improved the result of [2] presenting an almost optimal construction (with respect to the known black-box impossibility results) of UOWHFs from known-regular one-way functions.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, B must fail to be correct on some y ∈ L. In fact, there exist infinitely many n's in N and a function δ = δ (n) ∈ (0, 1]. such that B 1 (y, 1 n , δ ; •) is not 2 3 -correct for more than a fraction δ of the inputs y ∈ R L produced by D(1 n , •).…”
Section: Search Heuristics B Amentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations