2007
DOI: 10.2471/blt.06.033829
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Unwanted fertility among the poor: an inequity?

Abstract: Objective To determine if higher fertility and lower contraceptive use among the poorer segments of society should be considered an inequality, reflecting a higher desire for large families among the poor, or an inequity, a product of the poor being prevented from achieving their desired fertility to the same degree as wealthier segments of society. Methods Using the most recent Demographic and Health Surveys from 41 countries, we analysed the differences in fertility in light of modern contraceptive use, unwa… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
70
2
1

Year Published

2007
2007
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 91 publications
(81 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
7
70
2
1
Order By: Relevance
“…4 The evidence from six countries (Cambodia, the Dominican Republic, Ethiopia, Ghana, Kenya and Tajikistan) indicates that differences in health outcomes by ethnic group, educational attainment and region were more pronounced than the differences caused by wealth, the factor which work on inequity generally addresses. Against this backdrop, Gillespie et al 5 examine through an equity lens the prevailing differences by wealth quintile in total fertility, unwanted fertility, use of modern contraceptives and access to family planning services in developing countries. More specifically, they consider whether unwanted fertility among the poor compared with wealthier population segments is a case of an inequality (that is, a difference that has no moral implications) or an inequity.…”
Section: Inequity and Unwanted Fertility In Developing Countriesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…4 The evidence from six countries (Cambodia, the Dominican Republic, Ethiopia, Ghana, Kenya and Tajikistan) indicates that differences in health outcomes by ethnic group, educational attainment and region were more pronounced than the differences caused by wealth, the factor which work on inequity generally addresses. Against this backdrop, Gillespie et al 5 examine through an equity lens the prevailing differences by wealth quintile in total fertility, unwanted fertility, use of modern contraceptives and access to family planning services in developing countries. More specifically, they consider whether unwanted fertility among the poor compared with wealthier population segments is a case of an inequality (that is, a difference that has no moral implications) or an inequity.…”
Section: Inequity and Unwanted Fertility In Developing Countriesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to Demographic and Health Surveys from 41 countries, unwanted births in the poorest quintile of the populations were more than twice that observed in the wealthiest quintile. 25 According to the results of the research conducted by Erol et al in Izmir (located in Western Turkey) women's and husbands' older age and lower education, lower social class, women's recent migration to Izmir, lower household income and absence of social security had a negative impact on pregnancy intention. 26 Risk factors associated with unintended pregnancies determined by our study were similar to both the results of the studies in the world and the results of studies conducted in different regions of Turkey.…”
Section: Figure 3 Delivery Outcomes In Intended and Unintended Pregnmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1,6 An inequity exists when people are unfairly deprived of something they want or require to protect them from an unwanted or undesirable condition. 7 Differences in mortality and morbidity that relate to socioeconomic class constitute an inequity. The poor do not have the same access to life-saving and health-maintaining interventions as the rich, yet they aspire to the same healthy lives as those who are economically better off.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%