Unveiling Trends in Cultural Participation: The Case of Slovakia

Abstract

This paper explores the trends in participation in a variety of cultural activities in Slovakia. Although the research on cultural participation has thrived and there have been plenty of empirical studies published about the consumption of cultural products in different countries, there is still a lack of comprehensive research from former post-communist countries. The paper aims to test the link between cultural participation and social and economic characteristics, which has previously been done in other international studies. The cluster analysis suggests four types of Slovak cultural participants—the heritage visitors, the omnivores, the popular genre visitors, and the inactive. The outcomes point to a strong relationship between cultural inactivity and heritage visits to socioeconomic status, while there is a weak relationship between highbrow cultural participation and the upper-class. The results challenge cultural policies to be adjusted for different groups of cultural participants with the objective of increasing the overall consumption of cultural goods in Slovakia.

Understanding Employment Aspirations of Future Tourism and Hospitality Workforce: The Critical Role of Cultural Participation and Study Engagement

“…This overlaps with changes in the educational system, in which works of high culture are supplemented by products of popular culture (Verboord and Van Rees, 2008). Šebová and Révészová (2020), analyzing cultural participation in Slovakia, distinguished four clusters defined by age and education, which relate to the person's economic status: 1) occasional visitors to historical sites and libraries, 2) inactive persons, 3) cultural omnivores, and 4) persons focused on popular forms of culture. The first two clusters are characterized by lower cultural participation and the other two clusters by higher participation.…”

Transforming cultural policy in Eastern Europe: the endless frontier

“…Although post-state-socialist transformation and ethnic nationalist state-building perspectives remain relevant, they cannot exhaust the understanding of these processes. There is still a lack of cultural sociology exploring the relations between social and cultural capital and different forms of cultural participation in the traditional ethno-national, high and popular cultures (although see the illuminating study by Šebová and Révészová 2020). It is also necessary to move beyond the simplistic understanding of the (communist) authoritarian and (recent) populist regimes, which tend to view the relations between incumbents, state cultural administrations, the cultural sector and society in a mechanistic way (as in Bonet & Zamorano 2020).…”

The securitisation of cultural heritage

“…Although post-state-socialist transformation and ethnic nationalist state-building perspectives remain relevant, they cannot exhaust the understanding of these processes. There is still a lack of cultural sociology exploring the relations between social and cultural capital and different forms of cultural participation in the traditional ethno-national, high and popular cultures (although see the illuminating study by Šebová and Révészová 2020). It is also necessary to move beyond the simplistic understanding of the (communist) authoritarian and (recent) populist regimes, which tend to view the relations between incumbents, state cultural administrations, the cultural sector and society in a mechanistic way (as in Bonet and Zamorano 2020).…”