2006
DOI: 10.3102/00346543076003383
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Unveiling Professional Development: A Critical Review of Stage Models

Abstract: Traditionally, in research across professions, development of professional skill was seen as accumulation of knowledge and skills, promoted by practical experience. More recently, this view has been modified to incorporate skilful know-how that is progressively acquired by passing through developmental stages, such as novice, competent and expert. We critically review contemporary stage models that typically apply across professions. Our principal critique is that a focus on stages veils or conceals more funda… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
258
1
13

Year Published

2010
2010
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 383 publications
(279 citation statements)
references
References 81 publications
7
258
1
13
Order By: Relevance
“…The importance of the clinical placements to develop clinical expertise has been highlighted by Rushton and Lindsay (2007) and is consistent with the literature related to situated learning (Fish and Coles, 1998;Billett, 2001Billett, , 2004Dall'Alba and Sandberg, 2006) and mentorship (Daloz, 1999;Jensen et al, 1999). New knowledge and skills need to be learnt within the setting to which it is to be applied.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 69%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The importance of the clinical placements to develop clinical expertise has been highlighted by Rushton and Lindsay (2007) and is consistent with the literature related to situated learning (Fish and Coles, 1998;Billett, 2001Billett, , 2004Dall'Alba and Sandberg, 2006) and mentorship (Daloz, 1999;Jensen et al, 1999). New knowledge and skills need to be learnt within the setting to which it is to be applied.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 69%
“…Questioning by the educator enabled the practitioner to become aware of their assimilated hidden, taken for granted knowledge (Titchen, 2001). It is proposed that through critical enquiry this knowledge became less personally embedded (Kegan, 2000), more discriminating, integrated, differentiated, open (Mezirow, 1991), dependable and justified (Cranton, 2000) leading to more complex and comprehensive embodied understanding (Dall'Alba, 2004;Dall'Alba and Sandberg, 2006). This learning process enhanced their understanding of, and criticality towards, practice knowledge, which is considered essential for patient centred practice (Fish, 1998;Fish and Coles, 1998;Johns, 1998).…”
Section: Discussion Of Findingsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, teachers' professional development regarding their teaching competence is often not dealt within Didaktik and curriculum theory literature (e.g. Dreyfus and Dreyfus 1986;Berliner 1989;Dall'Alba and Sandberg 2006;Wermke 2013).…”
Section: Didaktik As Theory About Educational Interactionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With continued critical evaluation, these may then become more discriminating, integrated, differentiated, open [42], dependable and justified [43], leading to more complex and comprehensive embodied understanding [20,44]. Engagement in the process of critical evaluation may also foster a tentative, experimental and sceptical attitude towards practice knowledge [19].…”
Section: Learning Outcomesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fundamental to learning transition theory is the need for new knowledge and experience to contradict previously held knowledge and experience [7,[11][12][13], and is often associated with strong emotional reactions [7,[14][15][16][17][18]. The learning outcome of contradiction triggers change in practitioners' knowledge, attitude and behaviour, as they re-interpret past assumptions and experiences [7], and modify personal theories [19][20][21]. A variety of moderating factors influence and help to explain why individuals experience quite different learning transitions [7,8].…”
Section: Mean Age 382 (Range 31 To 52)mentioning
confidence: 99%