2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.cimid.2020.101432
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Unveiling patterns of viral pathogen infection in free-ranging carnivores of northern Portugal using a complementary methodological approach

Abstract: A B S T R A C TPathogen surveillance in free-ranging carnivores presents challenges due to their low densitie and secretive nature. We combined molecular and serological assays to investigate infections by viral pathogens (Canine parvovirus (CPV), Canine distemper virus (CDV) and Canine coronavirus (CCoV)) in Portuguese carnivores (Canis lupus, Vulpes vulpes, Lutra lutra, Martes foina, M. martes, Meles meles, and Genetta genetta) over a period of 16 years. Additionally we explored spatio-temporal patterns of v… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

1
11
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
(80 reference statements)
1
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Twenty-one out of 23 (91.3%) wolves tested positive to Carnivore protoparvovirus 1 DNA. A higher frequency (97.6%) of infection in wolves was reported in Portugal by Rosa et al [ 62 ], while a lower frequency was found in tissue samples of wolves from Spain (67.6%) [ 16 ] and Italy (54.3%) [ 13 ]. Contrary, other European studies described a much lower frequency of infection using molecular techniques, ranging from 5 to 15.2% in wolves from Portugal and Italy, respectively [ 18 , 20 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Twenty-one out of 23 (91.3%) wolves tested positive to Carnivore protoparvovirus 1 DNA. A higher frequency (97.6%) of infection in wolves was reported in Portugal by Rosa et al [ 62 ], while a lower frequency was found in tissue samples of wolves from Spain (67.6%) [ 16 ] and Italy (54.3%) [ 13 ]. Contrary, other European studies described a much lower frequency of infection using molecular techniques, ranging from 5 to 15.2% in wolves from Portugal and Italy, respectively [ 18 , 20 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Considering the high to moderate CDV and CPV seroprevalences reported in dog (CDV: 67–69%; CPV: 83–94%) and fox (CDV: 43–50%; CPV: 29–83%) populations at the vicinity of Tongoy-Guanaqueros towns ( 35 ), perhaps interaction rates between dogs and foxes may facilitate exposure to these canid-borne viruses at the periurban zone. However, further studies are needed to understand whether effective cross-species pathogen transmission occurs in our system and disease agents largely jump from dogs to foxes [e.g., ( 82 , 83 )], or sympatric wild foxes would be able to maintain endemic pathogen infections, similarly to other wild carnivores elsewhere [e.g., ( 84 , 85 )].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Infection with an enteric CCoV has only been sporadically detected in wolves ( Canis lupus lupus ), but lesions have not been described [ 161 , 162 ]. Similarly, in red foxes ( Vulpes vulpes ), CCoV infection causes mild, self-limiting enteritis followed by rapid recovery [ 163 ]. SARS-CoV RNA was detected in naturally infected red foxes from a live animal market [ 164 ].…”
Section: Coronavirus Diseases In Animalsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Eurasian otters ( Lutra lutra ) and common genets ( Genetta genetta ) have shown mild, self-limiting enteritis followed by rapid recovery associated with isolation of CoV-like particles [ 163 ].…”
Section: Coronavirus Diseases In Animalsmentioning
confidence: 99%