2019
DOI: 10.1021/acsami.9b15833
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Unveiling Carbon Ring Structure Formation Mechanisms in Polyacrylonitrile-Derived Carbon Fibers

Abstract: As the demand for electric vehicles (EVs) and autonomous vehicles (AVs) rapidly grows, lower-cost, lighter, and stronger carbon fibers (CFs) are urgently needed to respond to consumers’ call for greater EV traveling range and stronger safety structures for AVs. Converting polymeric precursors to CFs requires a complex set of thermochemical processes; a systematic understanding of each parameter in fiber conversion is still, to a large extent, lacking. Here, we demonstrate the effect of carbonization temperatur… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
30
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 64 publications
(84 reference statements)
0
30
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The larger pores in experimental samples act as stress concentration sites and thus lead to brittle fracture and lower strength. Moreover, the published work of computational large-scale carbon fiber microstructure stress-strain curves by Zhu et al [25] for three different structures have resulted in a comparable range of strength values between 6.73-6.90 GPa and Young's modulus of 95.9-284.5 GPa. Last, the simulated CF models showed crystallite arrangement around the longitudinal axis with turbostratic stacks of graphite structure, as shown in Figures S6-S9.…”
Section: Carbon Fiber Model Propertiesmentioning
confidence: 94%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The larger pores in experimental samples act as stress concentration sites and thus lead to brittle fracture and lower strength. Moreover, the published work of computational large-scale carbon fiber microstructure stress-strain curves by Zhu et al [25] for three different structures have resulted in a comparable range of strength values between 6.73-6.90 GPa and Young's modulus of 95.9-284.5 GPa. Last, the simulated CF models showed crystallite arrangement around the longitudinal axis with turbostratic stacks of graphite structure, as shown in Figures S6-S9.…”
Section: Carbon Fiber Model Propertiesmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Several atomistic approaches and computational tools were used to generate 2D and 3D microstructures of CF. The simulations range from surface studies with simplified graphene layers [20][21][22] and graphite blocks annealing [23] to complex precursor and reactive simulations [24,25] for the analysis of CF chemistry and mechanical properties. Therefore, an MD simulation (See Section 2.2.1) was used to model the range of CF microstructures with varied degrees of graphitic region.…”
Section: Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The ReaxFF C-2019 potential [ 45 ] was applied to the simulation process. ReaxFF C-2019 was developed to characterize the dissociation and formation of chemical bonds; thus, it was believed to be a suitable forcefield for the previous study of polymer precursors [ 46 , 47 ] and the current investigation of PPy carbonization.…”
Section: Computational Details and Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The mechanical properties of CNFs with and without the graphitic skin layer are investigated in this study using large-scale molecular dynamics (MD) simulations. This computational technique has been successfully applied to analysis of chemical reactions leading to the formation of carbon fiber microstructure from molecular precursors [25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32], oxidation of carbon fibers [33], as well as the elementary processes involved in mechanical deformation of carbon fibers [27,28,[34][35][36][37]. The high computational cost of MD simulations, however, prevents application of this technique for direct evaluation of the mechanical properties of fibers with heterogeneous microstructure, such as the ones of core-skin carbon fibers.…”
Section: Generation Of the Model Carbon Nanofibersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The tensile testing simulations are performed with a more computationally expensive [43] ReaxFF interatomic potential [29,44,45], which provides a more realistic, as compared to the AIREBO-M potential, description of the bond rearrangement and scission during the irreversible (plastic) deformation and fracture (see Supplementary Information for additional discussion of problems preventing the use of AIREBO-M in the simulations of fracture of carbon nanofibers). The ReaxFF force field used in this paper is parameterized for C/H/O/N chemistry [29] and has been successfully applied to simulation of different steps in the carbon fiber formation [28][29][30][31].…”
Section: Generation Of the Model Carbon Nanofibersmentioning
confidence: 99%