2016
DOI: 10.4103/2231-0746.200347
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Unusually large-sized peripheral ossifying fibroma

Abstract: Fibrous growths in the gingiva with the histopathological presence of calcifications are a common occurrence in the oral cavity. These lesions can be neoplastic in nature with either odontogenic or non odontogenic origin or they can be reactive lesions. This is a case report of an unusual presentation of peripheral ossifying fibroma , unusual because of its abnormally large size with review of literature.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
(25 reference statements)
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Giant POFs share some common clinical features: large atypical dimensions that may cause facial asymmetry and teeth displacement with no root resorption . These characteristics are generally not seen in conventional lesions .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Giant POFs share some common clinical features: large atypical dimensions that may cause facial asymmetry and teeth displacement with no root resorption . These characteristics are generally not seen in conventional lesions .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nonetheless, uncommon lesions have been detected with larger sizes, from 2.5 to 10.5 cm, and presented peculiar clinical and radiographic features . There are few published reports of large POFs, which may be referred to as gigantiform, large, giant, or simply POF . Thus, Childers et al .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Rarely, abnormally large sized peripheral ossifying fibroma and the lesion associated paraneoplastic syndrome such as osteomlacia can give rise to local and systemic complications [16,17].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Removal of local factors or irritants is also required. The recurrence rate is about 16-30% [4,16] and the recurrences are believed to be related to lack of inclusion of periosteum or periodontal ligament in the excised specimen. If the defect is large, in recurrent cases and for esthectic reasons, filling the area with reconstructive materials can be considered [18].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%