2012
DOI: 10.1155/2012/367349
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Unusual Foreign Body of Parotid Gland Presenting as Sialolithiasis: Case Report and Literature Review

Abstract: This case report highlights an unusual case where a foreign body in the parotid gland was initially thought to be sialolithiasis based on CT scans. The foreign body was safely retrieved from the parotid gland without formal superficial parotidectomy using methylene blue and an image intensifier to localize the lesion. Diagnosis and management of foreign bodies in the parotid gland are reviewed, and surgical options in removal of such lesions are discussed.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…3,4 The history of the object's entry often remains obscure or forgotten. 3,5 This could be because the injury leading to its entry might be trivial, and the subject might ignore or remain unaware of such an event. 5 In our patient, the chronicity of the discharging sinus and history of pulmonary tuberculosis initially led us to consider a chronic granulomatous lesion.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3,4 The history of the object's entry often remains obscure or forgotten. 3,5 This could be because the injury leading to its entry might be trivial, and the subject might ignore or remain unaware of such an event. 5 In our patient, the chronicity of the discharging sinus and history of pulmonary tuberculosis initially led us to consider a chronic granulomatous lesion.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Case studies indicate that foreign bodies can also penetrate parotid gland ducts without 12 or with development of foreign body-induced sialolith 13 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most are detected early due to imaging. However, misdiagnoses and failures to recognize retained oropharyngeal foreign bodies have rarely been reported because they are low on the differential diagnosis due to the incidence of the presentation of congenital anomalies in the pediatric age group, particularly when the history of the trauma is beyond recollection …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, misdiagnoses and failures to recognize retained oropharyngeal foreign bodies have rarely been reported because they are low on the differential diagnosis due to the incidence of the presentation of congenital anomalies in the pediatric age group, particularly when the history of the trauma is beyond recollection. 6 Ultrasonography may and preferably should serve as a good first-line investigative modality, followed by the more expensive magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) due to the abilities of these imaging modalities to identify radiolucent and radiopaque objects lodged in the soft tissues. 7 There is no denying that CT scan can also elucidate wooden or radiolucent foreign bodies.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%