“…Among the several tomographic techniques currently available, X-ray based methods have increasingly been piloted to fossil and modern brachiopods using both XMT (e.g., Hagadorn et al, 2001;Pakhnevich, 2007Pakhnevich, , 2009Pakhnevich, , 2010Pakhnevich, , 2011Pakhnevich, , 2014Pakhnevich, , 2017Angiolini et al, 2010;Błażejowski et al, 2011;Gaspard, 2013;Seidel and Lüter, 2014;Halamski et al, 2015;Streng et al, 2016) and SRXTM (e.g., Perez-Huerta et al, 2009;Motchurova-Dekova and Harper, 2010;Kaloyan et al, 2014), with varying degrees of success in terms of image resolution and authenticity. One of the key challenges for the use of XMT and SRXTM for palaeontology is the choice of the fossil samples to be scanned, as the resolution of resultant scanned images critically depends on the degree of contrast in the mineralogy between the fossils and the materials that surround them or infill their inner cavities: generally, the greater the disparity in mineralogy between the fossils and the neighboring materials, the higher the resolution and authenticity of the reconstructed fossil internal structures.…”