2022
DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.915725
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Untying Moral Efficacy and Meaningfulness in Promoting Students’ Social Entrepreneurial Intentions: The Mediating Role of Positive Reciprocity

Abstract: This study chooses to describe social entrepreneurship as a social mission that enables business students to identify opportunities to launch start-ups and social enterprises by understanding the nature of social responsibility and fostering a reciprocal attitude to solve social issues. We collected data on students from different business schools in mainland China through a structured questionnaire (n = 326) and analyzed them through structural equation modeling (SEM). The results show that moral efficacy and… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 68 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…GR and NR are intrinsic because they reflect organizations’ altruism and self-interest, respectively ( Sahlins, 1972 ). Previous studies showed that they could differently influence employees’ psychological states and behaviors, such as autonomous or intrinsic motivation ( Liu et al, 2021 ), deviant ( Restubog et al, 2010 ), or cheating behavior ( Kamran et al, 2022 ), affective commitment ( Quratulain et al, 2018 ), and social entrepreneurship intention ( Xiang and Zhang, 2022 ). Previous studies have demonstrated a generic model of SET social exchange ( Cropanzano et al, 2017 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…GR and NR are intrinsic because they reflect organizations’ altruism and self-interest, respectively ( Sahlins, 1972 ). Previous studies showed that they could differently influence employees’ psychological states and behaviors, such as autonomous or intrinsic motivation ( Liu et al, 2021 ), deviant ( Restubog et al, 2010 ), or cheating behavior ( Kamran et al, 2022 ), affective commitment ( Quratulain et al, 2018 ), and social entrepreneurship intention ( Xiang and Zhang, 2022 ). Previous studies have demonstrated a generic model of SET social exchange ( Cropanzano et al, 2017 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%