1962
DOI: 10.1007/bf00334791
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Untersuchungen zum Spermatozoendimorphismus von Opalia crenimarginata (Gastropoda, Prosobranchia)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

1
5
0

Year Published

1969
1969
2009
2009

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
1
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Earlier reports on other prosobranch species also indicate a nutritive function for atypical spermatozoa, e.g. Reinke (1914) for Strombus bituberculatus; Hanson et al (1952) for Vivipams viviparus; Battaglia (1953) for Columbella rustica; Bulnheim (1962) for Opalia crenimarginata, Scala clathrus and Janthina pallida; and Bulnheim (1968) for Epitonium tinctum. Hadfield (1966) reported that all atypical spermatozoa of S. squamigerus disintegrate within the male pallial gonoduct; he assumed the granules of the disintegrated atypical spermatozoa are incorporated in a layer of the spermatophoral wall, and he discussed their possible function as a nutrient for the typical spermatozoa.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…Earlier reports on other prosobranch species also indicate a nutritive function for atypical spermatozoa, e.g. Reinke (1914) for Strombus bituberculatus; Hanson et al (1952) for Vivipams viviparus; Battaglia (1953) for Columbella rustica; Bulnheim (1962) for Opalia crenimarginata, Scala clathrus and Janthina pallida; and Bulnheim (1968) for Epitonium tinctum. Hadfield (1966) reported that all atypical spermatozoa of S. squamigerus disintegrate within the male pallial gonoduct; he assumed the granules of the disintegrated atypical spermatozoa are incorporated in a layer of the spermatophoral wall, and he discussed their possible function as a nutrient for the typical spermatozoa.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…The first studies on spermatic dimorphism were by Siebold in 1836 using Paludina vivipara and later others species of Prosobranches were studied by Brock (1887), Retzius (1906), Reinke (1912), Kuschakewitsch (1913), Ankel (1924), Tuzet (1930), Bulnheim (1962Bulnheim ( , 1968, Nishiwaki (1964), Tochimoto (1967), Hadfield (1969), Giusti and Selmi (1982b). The ultrastructure of spermatozoa of Prosobranches has been studied in numerous Prosobranches by Ishizaki and Kato (1958), Yasuzumi and Tanaka (1958), Walker and McGregor (1968), Bulnheim (1962b), Giusti (1971), Melone et al (1978Melone et al ( , 1980, Koike (1985), Healy (1986b).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although atypical spermatogenesis in Prosobranchia has been known since the last century (Koehler, 1888), and many studies using optical microscopy have been carried out on it, the electron microscope increases considerably our knowledge of this strange cell formation. Studies have been done on atypical spermatogenesis in Cipangopaludina malleata (Yasuzumi and Tanaka, 1958;Yasuzumi et al, 1959Yasuzumi et al, , 1966, Melania libertina (Yasuzumi et al, 1962;Bulnheim, 1962), Viviparus (Gall, 1961), Fusitriton oregonensis (Buckland Nicks et al, 1982), and Pyruzus (Healy et al, 1981;Healy, 1982).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%