1973
DOI: 10.1111/j.1439-0310.1973.tb01105.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Untersuchungen über die Bedeutung optischer Parameter für das Heimkehrverhalten der Brieftaube

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
1
0

Year Published

1975
1975
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
(3 reference statements)
1
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The continuously high values near home, which have also been observed in another study (Schiffner et al, 2011a) suggest that the environmental gradients are still involved in the vicinity of the loft. This interpretation is in agreement with earlier observations (Schlichte, 1973) that pigeons deprived of object vision managed to approach the Frankfurt loft very closely. The tracks of pigeons very familiar with the area between the release site and the loft (Wiltschko et al, 2007;Schiffner et al, 2011a) showed that these birds chose slightly different routes from day to day, which argues against merely following familiar landmarks, as proposed for pigeons studied in the Oxford region (e.g.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 82%
“…The continuously high values near home, which have also been observed in another study (Schiffner et al, 2011a) suggest that the environmental gradients are still involved in the vicinity of the loft. This interpretation is in agreement with earlier observations (Schlichte, 1973) that pigeons deprived of object vision managed to approach the Frankfurt loft very closely. The tracks of pigeons very familiar with the area between the release site and the loft (Wiltschko et al, 2007;Schiffner et al, 2011a) showed that these birds chose slightly different routes from day to day, which argues against merely following familiar landmarks, as proposed for pigeons studied in the Oxford region (e.g.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 82%
“…O u r paper spectacles certainly caused a stronger impairment of vision than the contact lenses used by SCHMIDT-KOENIG & SCHLICHTE and SCHMIDT-KOENIG & WALCOTT. If not forced to fly, our pigeons were completely inactivated and thus would never have tried to find the loft entrance or the sleeping place in the loft, as has been done successfully by some of the pigeons wearing frosted lenses (SCHLICHTE 1973). Looking through the kind of paper used in our experiments it is impossible, at least for a human, to localize a pole 5 cm in diameter less than 50 cm away, but pigeons with frosted lenses could perceive such a pole over a distance of 2 m. Directional responses to landscape features over 1 km distance in stationary training experiments were markedly impaired by frosted lenses, but apparently not to a level of zero (response mean deviates 4" from training direction, vector length 0.24; p < 0.05, V test; SCHLICHTE 1973, Fig.…”
Section: Comparison With Earlier Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%