Verhalten Und Einstellung 1988
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-73549-3_2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Untersuchung von Einstellungs- und Selbstkonzeptänderung nach Verhaltensänderung

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Results of the item analysis are shown in Table 2 . Item difficulty was within the desired range (20–80%) and corrected item-scale correlations were good (> 0.5) [ 21 ]. Internal consistency of the CHIQ was good with Cronbach’s α = 0.88.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Results of the item analysis are shown in Table 2 . Item difficulty was within the desired range (20–80%) and corrected item-scale correlations were good (> 0.5) [ 21 ]. Internal consistency of the CHIQ was good with Cronbach’s α = 0.88.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The purpose of the difficulty index is to distinguish between patients with high and low symptom expression. Therefore, items that are answered “yes” or “no” by all test persons do not provide much information [ 27 ]. The item difficulty (P i ) was calculated: P i = (item mean X i /maximum score) ×100.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%