2009
DOI: 10.1080/17549170903112921
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Untapped density: site design and the proliferation of suburban multifamily housing

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
19
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
1
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The strip shopping area was adjacent to a small amount of multi-family housing that served to buffer the predominant single-family housing (Larco 2009). …”
Section: Target Area Implementation: Addressing Market Weakness and Mmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The strip shopping area was adjacent to a small amount of multi-family housing that served to buffer the predominant single-family housing (Larco 2009). …”
Section: Target Area Implementation: Addressing Market Weakness and Mmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This decline has been perceived as suburban due to the location of increases in ‘poverty, economic segregation, declining household incomes, overcrowding in schools, population loss and declines in homeownership' (Hanlon and Vicino, : 249). It has occurred alongside an increase in racialized newcomer communities and multifamily dwellings (Madden, ; Larco, ; Hanlon, ).…”
Section: From Inner City To Inner Suburbmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…segregation, declining household incomes, overcrowding in schools, population loss and declines in homeownership' (Hanlon and Vicino, 2007: 249). It has occurred alongside an increase in racialized newcomer communities and multifamily dwellings (Madden, 2003;Larco, 2009;Hanlon, 2010). Similar patterns in Toronto's postwar inner suburbs have garnered significant attention from policymakers and academics alike (Boudreau et al, 2009;Sewell, 2009).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These road-based networks may provide an adequate representation of non-motorized networks in some cases; however, they may be inappropriate in others. For example, in many cases the walkability or bikeability behavior in suburban areas may be vastly underestimated with the presence of large lots, trails and informal routes (Larco, 2009;Chin, Van Niel, Giles-Corti, & Knuiman, 2008).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The research in non-motorized transportation has brought attention to the faults of using built environment measures taken over larger areas, such as census geographies or transportation analysis zones (TAZs), as they may be obscuring variations or configurations that have implications for travel. For example, pockets of density, mixing and connectivity at levels that support walking may exist in many suburban locations and, in turn, there is evidence of substantial levels of walking activity in suburban areas -particularly around commercial centers (Moudon, Hess, Snyder, & Stanilov, 1997;Hess, Moudon, Snyder, & Stanilov, 1999;Larco, Stockard, Steiner, & West, 2013;Boarnet, Joh, Siembab, Fulton, & Nguyen, 2011;Larco, 2009;Handy & Clifton, 2001). Similarly, urban areas that on the aggregate would be considered walkable may have areas that present major barriers to walking or be inhospitable to cycling.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%