2022
DOI: 10.1080/00934690.2021.2022274
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Untangling the Taphonomy of Charred Plant Remains in Ritual Contexts: Late Antique and Medieval Churches and Graves from Croatia

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A second important aspect is the collection of control sediment samples outside the grave. Similarly, Reed et al (2022) have argued for the collection also of control samples for macroremains analysis. A third important methodological aspect is the calculation of the phytolith concentration.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A second important aspect is the collection of control sediment samples outside the grave. Similarly, Reed et al (2022) have argued for the collection also of control samples for macroremains analysis. A third important methodological aspect is the calculation of the phytolith concentration.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Körber-Grohne 1985;Rösch 2005; no Viking-Age finds are known to the authors of the present paper), while exceptional preservation sometimes shows the presence of processed plant food, such as breads made of a variety of cereals, pulses and flax (Linum usitatissimum), as found at Viking-Age Birka (Hansson 1996). On rare occasions, it is concluded that the majority of the plant remains attested in graves are not associated with the burial context itself or that the association is doubtful (Hansson and Bergström 2002;Kühn 2010;Šálková et al 2016;Lempiäinen-Avci et al 2017;Reed et al 2022).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%