Untangling the role of power in knowledge sharing and job performance: the mediating role of discrete emotions

Abstract

Purpose The purpose of this study is to empirically examine how psychological power explains dual conflicting emotions, influences and jeopardises knowledge sharing and eventually affects job performance. Specifically, this study argues that psychological power can induce feelings of pride and anxiety, which have opposite downstream effects on employees’ knowledge sharing and tasks, proactive and affiliative (TPA) performances. Design/methodology/approach This study tested the model using three waves of multi-source data from 46 teams and 357 respondents in the information technology and software industry in China. This study used multilevel structural equation modelling with Mplus 7.4 to examine the within-level team variance and thereby estimated the confidence intervals for the direct and indirect paths. Findings The results indicate that increased psychological power can cause contradictory emotions (i.e. pride and anxiety). Pride positively mediates the indirect influence of psychological power on knowledge sharing and TPA performance, while anxiety negatively mediates the above-mentioned indirect relationships. Research limitations/implications This study provides a novel perspective on how psychological forces shape people’s emotional experiences and subsequently their motivation to share knowledge and job performance. By integrating the existing power literature rooted in the approach/inhibition theory of power and cognitive appraisal theory of emotion, we identify two discrete emotions as underlying mechanisms between increased psychological power and motivation to share knowledge and job performance. Practical implications This research provides insights for managers regarding the ways in which psychological power can stimulate individuals to engage in negative behaviour towards others. Managers, in turn, must consider self-regulation to control this negative impact. Originality/value This study is among the earliest to examine the role of discrete positive and negative emotions caused by increased psychological power, which subsequently affect knowledge sharing and TPA performance.

Exploring the underlying mechanism between fear of losing power and knowledge hiding

“…The findings confirmed our prediction that FOLP has a significant and positive impact on employees’ SSB. These findings are aligned with the existing research showing that unsafe working environment reduces the psychological cognitive resources of power holders that, in turn, induces counterproductive and deviant behaviors ( Kahn, 1990 ; Luqman et al, 2022 ). Second, we determined that employees’ SSB is positively associated with KH (H2).…”

“…Powerful individuals not only have the control over resources ( Fiske et al, 2010 ) but also have the “ability to affect others while remaining immune from influence” ( Galinsky et al, 2008 ). These concepts imply that power lies in organizational structures whereby employees have the opportunities to influence others and possess resources ( Luqman et al, 2022 ). However, Galinsky et al (2003) argue that power is also a psychological state that varies by the situation at any point of time in the workplace.…”

Exploring the mechanism of empathy on lens language and linguistic landscape on movie-induced tourism: The moderating effect of cultural differences

“…This is in contrast to the traditional tourism approach that focuses on the physical space ( Gunn, 1988 ; Baloglu and McCleary, 1999 ; Tapachai and Waryszak, 2000 ). The advantage of mass media-based marketing is that it allows for a quick emotional connection to be built between the tourist and the destination, giving birth to movie-induced tourism ( Busby and Klug, 2001 ; Luqman et al, 2022 ; Luqman and Zhang, 2022 ).…”

Does cultural resource endowment backfire? Evidence from China’s cultural resource curse

“…Assessing the impact of the resource curse on bank efficiency from 12 oil-producing countries, the results confirm the existence of the resource curse, and countries that are overly dependent on natural resources tend to have lower financial development ( Umar et al, 2021 ). Few studies have focused on cultural aspects, especially the “cultural resource curse.” The closest study considers the tourism resource curse, where cultural tourism resources are seen as part of cultural resources ( Luqman et al, 2022 ; Wu and Lin, 2022 ). For example, the study by Khalik et al (2019) shows that there is a large temporal and spatial variation in the curse of tourism resources in China, and the spatial distribution pattern of the curse of tourism resources is high in the west and low in the east, caused by the spatial heterogeneity of talent scale, transportation accessibility, urbanization, service level, and economic development level.…”